Jump to content

Some numbers to chew on


silverpie
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Division II were maintaining exactly its schools list from last season, then you would have a total of 345 schools in Division I. The cutoff between A and AA would be at 501/510, with Jackson County, Douglass, Tellico Plains, Riverside, Loretto, and Donelson Christian the bottom of AA and Westwood, Boyd-Buchanan, Cascade, and Marion County the top of A. The AA/AAA cutoff would be at 1025, and bad news for softball teams in AA--you get to keep Gibbs, which is followed by Maplewood, Mitchell, Stone Memorial, and Fairley at the top of AA; the smallest AAA would be Carter, Whites Creek, Dyersburg, Chattanooga Central, and Memphis East.

 

 

However, it is my understanding that five current D1 schools have declared they will switch. Moving those five (USJ, JCS, DCA, FRA, and ZCA) out of the list, the A/AA cutoff remains the same. However, the AA/AAA cutoff moves by two positions, dropping Carter and Whites Creek into AA. (As for football cutoffs, AAA-L would have Morristown East as smallest, while Henry County would top AAA-S; in AA, I haven't checked the listings precisely (as there are some non-football schools in AA), but the bubble appears to be around Pigeon Forge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The football cutoff in Class A depends on whether the four MSFC schools in Division I choose to stay out or move to TSSAA competition. If they play TSSAA, then the three schools tied at 382 enrollment (Huntingdon, Wayne County, and Whitwell) go in the large group; if not, they go in the small.

 

In AA, there are either three or four non-football schools--Collegedale Academy, Martin Luther King, Hume-Fogg, and maybe Chattanooga Christian (currently playing a JV schedule). CCS's decision doesn't matter, though--the cut falls between Pigeon Forge small and East Lit large.

 

In AAA, Henry County just makes the cutoff as a small school, and Morristown East just misses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as for the effect on Division II: If they apply the D1 cutoff (with multiplier) to the un-multiplied D2 enrollments, then you get a small class of 29 schools and a large class of only 12! Granted, a few would play up... On the other hand, if you apply the cutoff on the basis that only a school that would be single-A in Division I should be D2A, that cut is almost as lopsided the other way, 28 large and 13 small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as for the effect on Division II: If they apply the D1 cutoff (with multiplier) to the un-multiplied D2 enrollments, then you get a small class of 29 schools and a large class of only 12! Granted, a few would play up... On the other hand, if you apply the cutoff on the basis that only a school that would be single-A in Division I should be D2A, that cut is almost as lopsided the other way, 28 large and 13 small.

 

 

It was my understanding that the multiplied Private numbers were to be used to establish the A/AA break (also to be applied to D2 large/small), followed by classification of Privates into D2 using the unmultiplied enrollment. Then, D1 remaining schools would be split using these numbers, leaving some Bubble Public classifications dependent on how many Privates made the Jump.

 

If it turns out to be the second scenario you mentioned above, then some of the Privates making the jump were told they would be in Small and will not. It is my understanding that one of the reasons some of the Privates did not jump before was the uncertainty of where they would be in D2. The goal this time was to let them know before the decision which has obviously made a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my understanding that the multiplied Private numbers were to be used to establish the A/AA break (also to be applied to D2 large/small), followed by classification of Privates into D2 using the unmultiplied enrollment. Then, D1 remaining schools would be split using these numbers, leaving some Bubble Public classifications dependent on how many Privates made the Jump.

 

If it turns out to be the second scenario you mentioned above, then some of the Privates making the jump were told they would be in Small and will not. It is my understanding that one of the reasons some of the Privates did not jump before was the uncertainty of where they would be in D2. The goal this time was to let them know before the decision which has obviously made a difference.

 

 

That makes sense, except that I think the only line drawn that considers which privates jumped is the football line within each class. When I get home, I'll run it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my understanding that the multiplied Private numbers were to be used to establish the A/AA break (also to be applied to D2 large/small), followed by classification of Privates into D2 using the unmultiplied enrollment. Then, D1 remaining schools would be split using these numbers, leaving some Bubble Public classifications dependent on how many Privates made the Jump.

 

If it turns out to be the second scenario you mentioned above, then some of the Privates making the jump were told they would be in Small and will not. It is my understanding that one of the reasons some of the Privates did not jump before was the uncertainty of where they would be in D2. The goal this time was to let them know before the decision which has obviously made a difference.

 

 

The TSSAA voted at its June 10 Board of Control meeting that the enrollment break line for A and AA will be the same in Division II as it is in D-I. Its Item 40 E. in the minutes of the June 10, 2008 TSSAA Board of Control posted on the TSSAA website. Whatever the break enrollment number turns out to be for D-I is going to be the enrollment number that determines the break between A and AA in D-II. The current break number between A and AA in D-I is 461/462. I believe that most feel that it will be higher than that based on the 2008 enrollment figures. Enrollments are not multiplied by 1.8 in D-II for purposes of determining classification. If you check the articles and other comments that appeared at the time of the Board of Control meeting, it is clear that the reason there was a push to have the A/AA break number the same for D-II as it is in D-I, which has not been the case in the past, was so that schools could easily determine what classification they would be in D-II in deciding whether or not to make the jump. So, those small privates that have already announced that they are going to move to D-II have either crunched the numbers or spoken with the TSSAA to satisfy themselves that the break line between A and AA for D-I is going to be high enough to assure them of being in the small school classification in D-II. I don't see any of those schools electing to move up to the large school classification in D-II like BGA and Ensworth have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes sense, except that I think the only line drawn that considers which privates jumped is the football line within each class. When I get home, I'll run it that way.

 

 

That may be the case for many, yet in our case (USJ), I am pretty sure we would fall AA, playing in the lower level, 3a, or whatever you want to call it (they need to use another letter other than "A"). Having to play ALL district teams in 3a/4a, then splitting at playoff time coupled with the "re-districting" under the Z-plan left us playing teams quite a bit larger than us.

 

That being said, and now that they are competing this year with a fairly young team, I am sure the "second-guessing" has begun. All in all, in the long run, I think it was the right decision to make yet my opinion wouldn't have mattered anyway. As a tuitiion paying parent, we were given NO opportunity to input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, it turns out that drawing the lines with D2 schools multiplied before declarations are made (which I don't see as likely, because if it were the case, you could announce the classes now), the A/AA line still doesn't move off 511. It moves the AA/AAA line slightly, though, with Gibbs, Carter, and Whites Creek moving up to AAA, and Henry County and maybe Walker Valley pushed up to AAA-L football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...