buchead Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 What do you think? # 63 Defensive Tackle (Cole Webster); # 30 Linebacker (Seth Emery) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reaction Posted November 23, 2008 Report Share Posted November 23, 2008 What do you think? # 63 Defensive Tackle (Cole Webster); # 30 Linebacker (Seth Emery) Both very deserving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardedbuc Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 BOTH ARE ANIMALS! no doubt if they dont get it there is something bad wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerplayer75 Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 whats webster stats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buchead Posted November 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 whats webster stats? 50 plus total tackles; 6 sacks; 12 TFL. Pretty impressive for a d-tackle that also played o-center Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buc55 Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 If anyone hass een them play, they know they are deserving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruthPrevails Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 If anyone hass een them play, they know they are deserving. Agreed!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchs51 Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 #30 is a heck of a player that wont shy away from any hit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerplayer75 Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 webster sonds prty good stats ok not great but its not just stats that get you to all-state im a DT but i prob wont make it i had 80+ tackles 7 sacks blacked punt blacked pass interception and some other smaller things i did make all region DL ill be happy if i just get to play college Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardedbuc Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 webster sonds prty good stats ok not great but its not just stats that get you to all-state im a DT but i prob wont make it i had 80+ tackles 7 sacks blacked punt blacked pass interception and some other smaller things i did make all region DL ill be happy if i just get to play college webster will play college ball if he just makes the decision too, I wouldnt be suprised if he makes all state at center the way he dominated up front, and prob only had about 10 plays off at DT all year and none at center during crucial playing time...and the way the defense is scemed up he is not even supposed to make many tackles... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsgridiron26 Posted November 28, 2008 Report Share Posted November 28, 2008 What do you think? # 63 Defensive Tackle (Cole Webster); # 30 Linebacker (Seth Emery) Cole who is around 6"2 260 will get a scholarship offer, if he dosent something is wrong and Emery, 6"1 220 should also get attention from colleges, both deffinatley should make all city and region. as for all state, both should be strongly considered because they both showed up each game for the bucs, this year and last. I also believe taylor shull, andrew crow, ben beasley and possibly nic houghes could attention for all region. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossbro Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 50 plus total tackles; 6 sacks; 12 TFL. Pretty impressive for a d-tackle that also played o-center Both very fine players.Maybe a couple of others deserving as well.What a turn around from last season. Did BB win their region this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.