Jump to content

5A game o' the week


just1np
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well, the best I can tell, Oakland and Smyrna looks like a really good game. I don't see any others that look as good as this one. In middle TN at least.

How is this one going to pan out? Both teams can score, but can either one play D?

Anyone brave enough to offer predictions?

:)

[Edited by just1np on 9-1-02 9:22P]

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by just1np:

Well, the best I can tell, Oakland and Smyrna looks like a really good game. I don't see any others that look as good as this one. In middle TN at least.

How is this one going to pan out? Both teams can score, but can either one play D?

Anyone brave enough to offer predictions?

 

Smyrna 28

Oakland 17

 

Don't have a vested interest in this one, I just think Oakland is a bit overated, and Smyrna has momentum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by itzme:
Posted by just1np:

Well, the best I can tell, Oakland and Smyrna looks like a really good game. I don't see any others that look as good as this one. In middle TN at least.

How is this one going to pan out? Both teams can score, but can either one play D?

Anyone brave enough to offer predictions?

 

Smyrna 28

Oakland 17

 

Don't have a vested interest in this one, I just think Oakland is a bit overated, and Smyrna has momentum.

 

 

 

Ok. I dont agree with your statement itzme, and here is why. i think oakland went out last week and proved they were a good team, even tho they were hit very hard with injuries. also, i have to think it is going to be a close game. i think, however, that oakland is more balanced, therefore giving them a better chance to win. also, i think oakland has a good enough defense, and secondary, to cause smyrna a little bit of trouble. i dont know much about smyrna's defense, but i just dont think they will be able to take 4 quarters of down hill, hardnosed football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by olineathlete:
Posted by itzme:
Posted by just1np:

Well, the best I can tell, Oakland and Smyrna looks like a really good game. I don't see any others that look as good as this one. In middle TN at least.

How is this one going to pan out? Both teams can score, but can either one play D?

Anyone brave enough to offer predictions?

 

Smyrna 28

Oakland 17

 

Don't have a vested interest in this one, I just think Oakland is a bit overated, and Smyrna has momentum.

 

 

 

Ok. I dont agree with your statement itzme, and here is why. i think oakland went out last week and proved they were a good team, even tho they were hit very hard with injuries. also, i have to think it is going to be a close game. i think, however, that oakland is more balanced, therefore giving them a better chance to win. also, i think oakland has a good enough defense, and secondary, to cause smyrna a little bit of trouble. i dont know much about smyrna's defense, but i just dont think they will be able to take 4 quarters of down hill, hardnosed football.

 

I'll grant you may know more about this than I do. All I've seen is Oakland in their last scrimmage, and some TV highlights on Smyrna. I wouldn't stake my rep on it, but I'll stick with the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I KNOW that Oakland had an easier opponent in Glencliff, that Smyrna did with H'ville. Smyrna opens against a runner-up, Oakland against a losing team. Just a thought.

I think SHS may be able to pull this one out.

But OHS has a lot of talent and coaching.

I won't be picking this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, i hear what your saying. But beleive me when i say this. oakland preformed 200 times better on friday night than they did in any of their scrimmages. Aside from turning the ball over 3 times off of fumbles, and a few miscues on the 2nd team defense's part, they played alot better than their scrimmages. I think you should come watch the game if u get the chance. your right, it will be a good game.

 

Ohs- 28

shs- 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted by olineathlete:

Yea, i hear what your saying. But beleive me when i say this. oakland preformed 200 times better on friday night than they did in any of their scrimmages. Aside from turning the ball over 3 times off of fumbles, and a few miscues on the 2nd team defense's part, they played alot better than their scrimmages. I think you should come watch the game if u get the chance. your right, it will be a good game.

 

Ohs- 28

shs- 14

 

I will if I'm in town...I may be in Memphis instead. BTW, it's nice to have an adult, civilized exchange on this board for once. Thanks!! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have seen both teams in scrimmages against hillsboro and in what i saw i think oakland looked better then. But knowing it was just scrimmages and that smyrna was the first week of 2 a days i cant reall judge them but i would say it will be a very good game. I think oakland may have a better group up front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...