Jump to content

Refs with a chip on their shoulder


Uknow
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've been watching bb here for 15 seasons...I can tell before a game if each ref at that gave will be fair or will pick for one team or another. There are about 4 around here who are just terrible and one is always trying to give a T to the coach or team. It should never be like that but it is. and if you ever try to point it out on a post you are told you are blaming a loss on the refs, even if you win!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The technical was because Loretto didn't have a sub in the game in the allotted time after a player fouls out. I do agree there were some very strange calls made in short amount of time. It pretty much decided the outcome at that point.

 

Here's a question about the free throws shot after the technical.

A foul is called on Loretto. The Loretto player fouls out, it's the 9th team foul. Then the technical is called on Loretto. Santa Fe shoots the technical free throws first, while the fouled out player is still on the floor. The player then goes to the bench and the sub enters. The fouled Santa Fe player now goes to the line and gets 2 shots because Loretto now has 10 team fouls because of the technical. I think the officials screwed this completely. I'm no official but I think Santa Fe should have shot a one and one first then the technical then had the ball out of bounds.

 

What would have been the correct call in this situation?

 

That is a crazy reason for a technical, because you really don't have to put in a sub. there is no rule that you have to have 5 players out there. you can resume play with only 4 players on the court. don't know if that is a legitimate reason for a "T" or not. :thumb:

 

 

You need to read your rule book again. If you have 5 available players you must put 5 on the court. After a player fouls out, the coach has 20 seconds to replace that player , provided he or she has a player available, or it is a technical foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...