Jump to content

Can Farragut win back2back titles?


JuicyFruit
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They can do it as long as their defense plays a solid 80 minutes. If they play Brentwood they will be playing a solid defensive team. Although Brentwood was a little inconsistent down the stretch they have a real solid team. Lets face it when two really good teams play each other anything can happen. Both teams need to play real solid fundamental soccer because the slightest mistake can cost them the game. I give Farragut the edge on offense, but Brentwood the edge on defense. That is if they meet in the finals. Each team has to win one more game to go to the finals. If Farragut can score 3 goals they should win. But a matchup of Farragut and Brentwood would probably be the 2 best teams in the state. Like Ive said before goalkeeping will be the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes they will win back2back. The only team i see getting in their way is brentwood. If Brentwood plays the best game they have played all year and farragut plays mediocre then i see brentwood taking it, but if both teams show up and play hard i think the game belongs to farragut. It's farraguts game to lose. Good luck BHS though, im pulling for you guys, represent the midstate! you have done a better job than the other teams in memphis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farragut has it, i think the only team that had a chance at them was BHS and McMinn, after how they stomped McMinn and seeing that brentwood is out, i think that it is Farragut all the way. Oak Ridge however did beat BHS so maybe they will give Farragut a run for their money, but i think if Farragut plays well, they game is theirs to lose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DII stuff doesn't have anything to do w/Farragut's chance of winning. i saw houston dismantle a very good hendersonville, and later saw farragut won like 5-0 over them, so i don't think it matters who they could possibly play, they'll win. oak ridge is a pretty good team, but they're keeper will probably end up costing them the game. otherwise they have a very solid sweeper and many good midfielders and forwards, but i don't think they can upset farragut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • plus it removes the pressure around winning.
    • You are correct.   The teacher's pay scale is virtually the same in Knox County, now, as it is at Oak Ridge.   The coaching supplements are still higher at Oak Ridge, from what I was told, but not a huge difference.   Plus, Rusty is going from a position coach to an OC position, which is what he was at South Doyle and where his comfort zone is.  And from a special education teaching slot to a PE teaching slot.  There is a lot of positivity in that move without even considering the coaching aspect.   Anybody who sees something negative here is just looking for negativity to begin with.  But some live in that world.   Really good hire for Brent.  He now has two experienced and quality coordinators and can concentrate on being a head football coach.  
    • He was pretty darn good for a freshman, but he will have a hard time seeing the field at Oakland for a good while, I’m afraid.
    • Dang I feel bad for the kid. I’m sure he loves his dad and wants to do anything for his dad but I don’t think he realizes his dad isn’t doing the best for his football career if he keeps jumping schools.
    • I’m not taking shots at the kid, but “athlete” is not something I would use to describe him. He was a long, lengthy, defensive back
×
  • Create New...