texas23

She does not get it. This is a male dominated sport and the humor involved and the comments have completed escaped her, probably because she does not understand the male conversation. I doubt that allsaints or BCB are the level of "creep" that she has proclaimed them to be. She is yelling fire where none exist. Growing older will fix most of those issues for her, I would bet on it.

Hmmm.....all administrative employees of the school system.......Maybe a few sports people should be on the Board to sponsor the other side of athletic arguments.....

The reason he is not doing the things you ask about is that he is getting good advice from his staff. Why does he need to start talking substance when he is winning his way past the evil witch to the nomination>? He has no reason to currently change what he is doing, it is working. It only makes great sense for him to continue to whip that witch until he has secured the democrats nomination. In the general election this will not work. He will have to begin to reveal his specific plans or he will be on the other end of the whoopin'. He will change.

I agree with ELA, this man has motivated people to join his vision. No substance as of yet, but he has been able to pull the ole Charles Manson trick. The results may be positive and they many not be, because who knows what ship they are boarding with Obama now. I know I do not have a clue as to where that ship is headed. It may be Hawaii or it may be the Arctic Circle. He has not won the general election yet and that remains to be the true test of his popularity, and even then we know the popular vote is not how we elect the president......remember Al Gore in 2000.

Dandy, What ELA fails to communicate is that even though every politician in a presidential race or an elected president does use speech writers, but the speech writers do not make up the stances that the politician makes, they only put those stances into words that help describe and motivate the electorate. So I am with you on the ideas comments, no new ideas, just written by the same no new ideas guy who wrote for Edwards. Can you explain this to ELA, he do not comprehend me.

OJ was found innocent too.......hmmmm...makes you think.

I can hardly wait for the well thought out reply....... /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" />

On one thread on this board we go on about how tough wrestling is and how some sport play with balls while wrestlers must have them to participate,,,,,,yet now, on this thread we talk about the way the second best wrestler in the state probably can not handle the cheers in the crowd. which sport is this anyway?

BearCatB. a creep? Nah......he is just misunderstood by some chick that has no clue as to how humor works...... relax and enjoy the posts. BCB,,,,,,keep 'em coming. /thumb[1].gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":thumb:" border="0" alt="thumb[1].gif" />

spend a few dollars in a strip club.....LOL...... I could not agree more with the entire premise of wanting anyone but Hillary to lead this country. I would be ashamed to acknowledge Hillary as the person that is the Commander in Chief. I would consider going AWOL if I were still in the service, but I know I would remain in my unit and do my job. She got her big rear end handed to her again yesterday by those in the Great White North of Wisconsin. Go figure.

I think she is headed for the iceberg......in a titanic fashion.

I would rather not see that (insert the Jane Fonda famous recent comment) be the nominee and take the chance that McCain wins anyway.

I hope the RAV wrestler is not harmed by the non handshake, that would be a shame. Just give the coach a call as he suggested, tell him who you are, as he asked directly and get this thing settled for yourself. What did you see mat side that suggest that Coach E. owes an apology?

you must not know Heath. If you did you would know he is being sincere in his post. You should hold you "man up" comments. That is no way to get a reasonable answer.

yep....gonna vote for Obama in the primary in Texas. /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":blink:" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />

I believe he has contributed to Polk county schools as well.

Here is the problem with your original rant: All I know is there will be several medalist at 171 who should know they did not win a true place position, no way to deny how that sounds.......

fishy smelling cigar........LOL.....that poor cigar. /roflol.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roflol:" border="0" alt="roflol.gif" />

maybe that is why the score was so close, Young was injured.

It has to do with Major League Baseball's anti-trust exemption granted by the congress.

and also quit saying that Republicans will not admit something that you think is correct, you have no idea on that at all.

BTW,,,,,most coaches are not one year guys, it is never in the best interest of the school to have a continued turnover in that position. Are you saying that everyone of those one year contracts were not offered up the next year by the school? I would say that one year engagements at a school are as rare as the 10-20 year stints too. Do you agree? I do not see a problem with a philosophy of wanting people to make it on their own efforts. Why must we have national programs that are continually abused by people. That is the rub with most tax payers. People who could, but won't. Not the truly needy.

I would like ELA to reconcile having the government pay for everything in a person's life, like insurance and food stamps, etc and not have any other rights to protect the nation that it feeds from the tax money the govt. must use to provide for every "little man". sounds like you want it both ways. pay for everything but stay the heck out of my life.

ELA knows he is walking a funny little chalk line with his comments,,,,,he said that the president has "exercised more power" than any other president. That says nothing about it being illegal, unethical or any other negative string to the acts.

Republicans tend to support smaller government and less big brother in your wallet, while democrats tend to believe that everyone needs a big brother and that other big brothers need to give to the common good (like a commune) for those who will not/cannot make it on their own. Tax and spend comes to mind for a clear and unbiased view of democrats.