Anon20

Regardless, it's a completely different issue than a hardship issue/NCLB issue.

Having seen both teams play, and the way Grundy C has played against the pass, ND's QB/WR combo in Moore/Riley should be hot all night. But Grundy will be able to run the ball so it could possibly be a high scoring game. Either way seems to be a good game!

Don't see how ND could be in trouble.. private school vs. public

Never have been or will be a SP fan myself. But by this you are saying you do actually have recruiting connections in Georgia? Interesting

Can we stop the mindless bashing and actually discuss the issue at hand, the boy's ineligibility? By the end of this ordeal I wouldn't put it past you to have deemed half the schools in Tennessee as the one who turned Signal in.

Very true, but hey, now Polk can't have any excuses why they lost to the eagles

Well any way you look at it, it could have been anyone.. among us.. angry citizens of Chattanooga, that could have.. set the oven to a boil. But way I look at it, they won't find nuffin wrong with the darned boy. They'll suspend him this week but let him off to play the rest of the season.

Right, for a much different situation where a girl transferred from ND to Signal which caused the issue. This situation, however, doesn't really even affect ND.

Still, how do they get in?

I see where you are going with this, but still I find it unlikely ND, or any school at that, would have complained. This most likely is a disgruntled parent or booster. And to the bolded, I highly doubt they would still even get a shot for the playoffs without winning a single division game.

Bit different situation though from what it looks like. If ND was playing Signal and they knew the girl had played the year before for them it's kind of obvious, whereas this really doesn't concern ND. With or without McClendon Signal dominates ND, or to be honest the rest of the teams they play.

Wouldn't jump to conclusions about Notre Dame. Seems to me that this must have been an issue within TSSAA since the beginning of the year. Don't know why this is being adressed as late as game 7 though. Isn't the first time the TSSAA has made questionable decisions..

I shouldn't have blasted the Troll, you are right. But yet, the poop's finally starting to stink up there on that mountain it seems.

Waiting for an official response from the Troll. I'm sure him and the other boosters can clear this up with the officials.

I'm going with TSSAA on this one, they have had about 2 months since the last time they have had to deal with Signal so hopefully they can fix the problems on defense against Signal's powerful offense. I also think Signal won't be as good without their ineligible players on the field therefore giving TSSAA the easier win. Could turn into a shoot-out. You think I'm joking, but I am. TSSAA 42 Signal 21

Now that's some funny stuff Troll Guess the nickname "Signal Sinners" is applicable

ER limits Red Bank's O to minimal yardage, but can't produce any O for themself. RB-14 ER-7

Central by 3 TD's, I truly believe coach Allen is the answer to Central football

ND by 20

I disagree. The D came out shaky the first half and was allowing a lot of rushing yards, but the second half they stepped the D up it seemed, you had (one?) touchdown the second half on basically a fluke pass play?? They stuffed it up the 2nd half and pulled away. Gotta give the D cred for coming out the locker room at half fired up.

You always go for the underdogs?

Beg to differ. I was at the Grace game, they have speed. Loads of it. It's size on the defense they lack (LB's, Line)

From what I saw at the Grace ND game, Notre Dame has some monsters on the O-line. While they do have a few smallish sized boys on the line, they had 2 or 3 pretty big sized boys who blocked great (no sacks, very few TFL) It was also a first game, so defense is always a bit shaky. Will be an interesting game at the beginning, but I'm going ND 42, MC 17