Jump to content

Richard Siegel Park-State Tournament


MD4Sports
 Share

Recommended Posts

Having recently returned from attending the State tournament for the fourth year in a row, the stadium field and the side fields seemed to be in the worst shape of the three years it has been held there.

 

The stadium field in particular had multiple dead spots and it was completely dried out. The bermuda was in fair shape at best. Certainly they have an adequate irrigation system, but I was surprised the field was so parched.

 

The other fields had multiple sod patch jobs throughout also.

 

Four years ago at the Mike Rose complex, the side fields were in average shape, but the stadium field was pristine. It was disappointing to see the fields in these conditions for the state tournament.

 

I'd be interested to know what the players thought, especially those who have been to state the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Doc, NOTHING compared to that Mike Rose complex field the first year we played there (in 2003). It was 120 yards of heaven! But it, too, started to deteriorate as the years went by.

 

I would agree that the stadium field was extremely dry and average surface at best. The other fields, though, were far better than the Mike Rose fields from 2004 and 2005 (they were in bad shape from over use).

 

I would also say that even though none of the fields were the best surfaces to play on, I would LOVE to have even half of that complex in Knoxville. (How many fields are there?)

 

I don't know where the money comes from for the upkeep of those fields. They obviously are fairly conservative on club teams using them (they weren't worn down other than the boxes) just really dry and deceptively bumpy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From those of us in the Memphis area where bermuda is king, please know that bermuda requires warm nights and hot days to grow. Probably the cooler weather this year affected the surface at Siegel.

 

As for the Mike Rose, unfortunately Big G is right and the side fields remain in rough shape from over use. However, the stadium is making a nice rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From those of us in the Memphis area where bermuda is king, please know that bermuda requires warm nights and hot days to grow. Probably the cooler weather this year affected the surface at Siegel.

 

As for the Mike Rose, unfortunately Big G is right and the side fields remain in rough shape from over use. However, the stadium is making a nice rebound.

 

 

Maybe there is a water restriction in the area that limits how much they can irrigate. The stadium field just seemed really parched.

 

Anyway, is Spring Fling committed to Murfreesboro for next year or for multiple years? I read on here that it was coming back, but I haven't seen anything official.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fields were better than Mike Rose, but they have become bumpy.

The Baylor vs. CB game involved a hole in one of the goal nets that caused quite an uproar on Baylor's tying goal that was disallowed. Why were the nets not inspected or replaced prior to the state championships?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why were the nets not inspected or replaced prior to the state championships?

 

 

Given a multi-year drought in Tennessee, I thought the fields looked in reasonably good shape, although not as outstanding as I have heard they have been in earlier years. I really admire that facility and prefer it to Mike Rose, except for the magnificent Rose stadium facility. I am a big fan of having the State Tournament in the Middle region every year. Going to Memphis every year was extremely expensive and created serious fairness issues for teams in the East. Of course, East Tennessee simply doesn't have the facilities to host this kind of event properly, so taking turns isn't possible. I hope the girl's tournament moves from Chattanooga to Murfreesboro soon so there can be one central venue.

 

As for the net issue Baylor encountered, you're right, that should never happen in a state championship or any other match for that matter. You would have expected, even if the venue manager and the TSSAA didn't conduct adequate pre-event inspections of the facility, that the referees would have discovered and required a hole in the net to be repaired during their pre-match inspection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given a multi-year drought in Tennessee, I thought the fields looked in reasonably good shape, although not as outstanding as I have heard they have been in earlier years. I really admire that facility and prefer it to Mike Rose, except for the magnificent Rose stadium facility. I am a big fan of having the State Tournament in the Middle region every year. Going to Memphis every year was extremely expensive and created serious fairness issues for teams in the East. Of course, East Tennessee simply doesn't have the facilities to host this kind of event properly, so taking turns isn't possible. I hope the girl's tournament moves from Chattanooga to Murfreesboro soon so there can be one central venue.

 

As for the net issue Baylor encountered, you're right, that should never happen in a state championship or any other match for that matter. You would have expected, even if the venue manager and the TSSAA didn't conduct adequate pre-event inspections of the facility, that the referees would have discovered and required a hole in the net to be repaired during their pre-match inspection.

 

 

I did notice a few dry spots on the fields where in some the grass was completely dead. Going back to the Mike Rose stadium field though, that one is going to be in excellent condition because that's also where the University of Memphis plays their home soccer matches. They're of course going to try to keep that field in as great of shape as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mike Rose Stadium pitch has a fantastic state-of-the-art irrigation and drainage system. I recall one year at Club States (2002 or 2003) when it rained 3 or 4 inches overnight and through the hours leading up to the finals. Just prior to warm ups we were standing in ankle deep water all over the stadium, yet by game time the standing water was gone and the pumping system went on to remove the surface water almost entirely by match time. It was incredible. Unfortunately, the side fields have to fend for themselves. They have been overused and maintenance has fallen off markedly from when the complex first opened. The last year I was there for high school states, I thought the regular fields were just shy of terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw here on Coacht that the Fling is coming to Murfreesboro for one more year before they accept bids again next year.

 

Chattanooga is going to bid. Doubt Memphis will since they lost money on their three year run. And I'm sure Murfreesboro will want it to stay there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they have bleachers? I heard that you have to bring your own chairs or stand. That seems really cheap to me for a state tournament atmosphere.

 

They have bleachers, but they are the short ones, seat about 20 people. However, I have never been to a soccer complex where bleachers are at every field. The championship field has large bleachers. Everyone knows when you go to a soccer complex to being chairs, this is normal for anyone who plays soccer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fields were better than Mike Rose, but they have become bumpy.

The Baylor vs. CB game involved a hole in one of the goal nets that caused quite an uproar on Baylor's tying goal that was disallowed. Why were the nets not inspected or replaced prior to the state championships?

 

 

 

Just for clarification, there was never a tying goal to disallow. The ball hit the side of the net, and the net was loose. I do agree shame on the game officials for not doing a good pre-game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...