Jump to content

TCA v. Huntington Scrimmage... What are your thoughts?


tcaee
 Share

Recommended Posts

First let me say huntington is better than collinwood. If both played right now huntington would win 28-21 or 28-14 something like that imo. The reason being Huntington is that much bigger and more physical. Second, TCA's defense did get pounded by Huntington, but they would bend and not break. For someone to say TCA got thrashed or would get thrashed by Huntington is ignorant. :roflol: Now, what yall did to USJ last year was what you call a thrashing.

Q: How many players go both way for Huntington? I noticed quite a few jogging on and off the field after each change of possession. TCA has 12 or 13 guys that actually play and most go both ways and special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Saying that Huntingdon is 3-4 TD's better than Trinity is down right outrageous. TCA won the scrimmage, turnovers and just offensive scoring. They did handle TCA's defense, but TCA DID force a turnover on every drive except for one. I believe that if anything TCA is a TD or 2 better. Just my honest opinion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be mean spirited here, heck its just a scrimmage. But come on now, Huntingdon's second backs and qb's split time with their first the entire scrimmage, as did several of their lineman and we still rammed it down your throat. Not to mention our secondary. After rethinking this and taking all that into consideration plus the fact that we are more physical and our seconds played with your firsts, i'd say we win by 4 td's, and thats being kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh so now the object of football is to see which team can punt the least? And our punter got hurt during the game? He's one of the best kickers in all of 1a... I would call that an advantage... It appears to me that YOU are a disgruntled player who has nothing better to do than make up excuses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If ur saying that in a real game huntingdon would win ur dead wrong... in a real game turnovers mean u lose the ball to the other team and dont get to keep driving... well in that case huntingdon would have only scored 1 offensive td in a real game as they turned the ball over before each of the other tds... and trinity would have 3 so that means that TCA woulda won if u ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After rethinking this and taking all that into consideration our seconds played with your firsts, i'd say we win by 4 td's, and thats being kind.

 

Are you saying Trinity's first string was on the field with Huntingdon's second string? How can you know?

Several people watch Huntingdon practice on a regular basis. We know which boys are first and second string.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well from what I saw, the only player on the field that switched with a 2nd teamer was the QB. 2nd, TCA scored 4 offensive touchdowns without turning the ball over on the drive, Huntingdon scored one like that. Saying Huntingdon is 4 TD's better is a ridiculous statement, and you have no evidence to support that statement. I believe that if a team wins a scrimmage like that, theres no way the team on the losing end is 4 tds better, or better at all, than the winning team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...