Jump to content

white house coach


Softballghost
 Share

Recommended Posts

It has to he hard for her to sleep tonight choosing her pitcher who got hammered for 11 runs against Goodpasture tonight for district 9AA MVP. Might I add Cartwright for Goodpasture gave up 1 run against white house in this Tourney. You should be ashamed coach. Fogle is a great pitcher and deserved all district and she is MVP for her team, but not better than Cartwright

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has to he hard for her to sleep tonight choosing her pitcher who got hammered for 11 runs against Goodpasture tonight for district 9AA MVP. Might I add Cartwright for Goodpasture gave up 1 run against white house in this Tourney. You should be ashamed coach. Fogle is a great pitcher and deserved all district and she is MVP for her team, but not better than Cartwright

 

You have to be from Goodpasture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greenbrier actually did you see something I didn't at this tournament, or wait are you from White House

 

Sorry about that and yep I claim White House. The only thing I saw differently was three good pitchers that could stand toe to toe with each other on any given day and one was from Greenbrier. Just my observations.

 

Who deserved and didn't deserve what, I am not sure. I saw girls make some good plays and I saw girls make some mistakes from all the teams. Thank goodness they left the voting up to the district coaches because the fans would never agree! :)

 

I thought the three top teams all did a good job and any of the three could have been playing for the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree all three teams could of played for the title, but to vote against the obvious MVP is really upsetting. Don't get me wrong the three pitchers are great but seeing that white house along with Greenbrier got extra votes because we played more games is not fair to the number 1 seed.You should get the same amount of votes and not be punished for being the 1 seed. I hope in the future they fix this way of voting. What if it was our pitcher and we were the number 1 seed and didn't get as many votes but she was clearly the MVP in the tournament, it would be wrong. Coaches should not be biased to those players but be honest and say this player is the MVP. I mean if you clearly dominate other teams and shut down the runner up then that player deserves the award. Its obvious everyone wants to beat Goodpasture but let's not pick a player for a award she clearly didn't deserve. Its funny how the tourney was in white house and they got the most awards and the championship team the least of the three. Really!! If white house has all those great players then why didn't they win, heck we got more awards and we were third place. It was just wrong! [quote name='lmdjr340' timestamp='1336663700' post='2797

Sorry about that and yep I claim White House. The only thing I saw differently was three good pitchers that could stand toe to toe with each other on any given day and one was from Greenbrier. Just my observations.

 

Who deserved and didn't deserve what, I am not sure. I saw girls make some good plays and I saw girls make some mistakes from all the teams. Thank goodness they left the voting up to the district coaches because the fans would never agree! :)

 

I thought the three top teams all did a good job and any of the three could have been playing for the title.

Edited by softballghost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry about that and yep I claim White House. The only thing I saw differently was three good pitchers that could stand toe to toe with each other on any given day and one was from Greenbrier. Just my observations.

 

Who deserved and didn't deserve what, I am not sure. I saw girls make some good plays and I saw girls make some mistakes from all the teams. Thank goodness they left the voting up to the district coaches because the fans would never agree! :)

 

I thought the three top teams all did a good job and any of the three could have been playing for the title.

 

I'll tell ya what NOBODY SAW...was where that moon shot that #20 for the Lady Cougars hit off of Miss Fogle in the championship game landed...if it ever did!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree all three teams could of played for the title, but to vote against the obvious MVP is really upsetting. Don't get me wrong the three pitchers are great but seeing that white house along with Greenbrier got extra votes because we played more games is not fair to the number 1 seed.You should get the same amount of votes and not be punished for being the 1 seed. I hope in the future they fix this way of voting. What if it was our pitcher and we were the number 1 seed and didn't get as many votes but she was clearly the MVP in the tournament, it would be wrong. Coaches should not be biased to those players but be honest and say this player is the MVP. I mean if you clearly dominate other teams and shut down the runner up then that player deserves the award. Its obvious everyone wants to beat Goodpasture but let's not pick a player for a award she clearly didn't deserve. Its funny how the tourney was in white house and they got the most awards and the championship team the least of the three. Really!! If white house has all those great players then why didn't they win, heck we got more awards and we were third place. It was just wrong!

Sorry about that and yep I claim White House. The only thing I saw differently was three good pitchers that could stand toe to toe with each other on any given day and one was from Greenbrier. Just my observations.

 

Who deserved and didn't deserve what, I am not sure. I saw girls make some good plays and I saw girls make some mistakes from all the teams. Thank goodness they left the voting up to the district coaches because the fans would never agree! :)

 

I thought the three top teams all did a good job and any of the three could have been playing for the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree all three teams could of played for the title, but to vote against the obvious MVP is really upsetting. Don't get me wrong the three pitchers are great but seeing that white house along with Greenbrier got extra votes because we played more games is not fair to the number 1 seed.You should get the same amount of votes and not be punished for being the 1 seed. I hope in the future they fix this way of voting. What if it was our pitcher and we were the number 1 seed and didn't get as many votes but she was clearly the MVP in the tournament, it would be wrong. Coaches should not be biased to those players but be honest and say this player is the MVP. I mean if you clearly dominate other teams and shut down the runner up then that player deserves the award. Its obvious everyone wants to beat Goodpasture but let's not pick a player for a award she clearly didn't deserve. Its funny how the tourney was in white house and they got the most awards and the championship team the least of the three. Really!! If white house has all those great players then why didn't they win, heck we got more awards and we were third place. It was just wrong!

 

Ok, I respect the fact that you think the wrong person won. Everybody has their own opinion and I will always respect that. After all, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. If the shoe was on the other foot then I am sure someone else would be upset. That's a never ending story.

I don't think anybody was disrespected or favored because of the team they play for. I don't know how any of the coaches voted and I doubt that anyone does except the coaches. Everything at this point is just speculation.

If a different player, regardless of what team she played for had won MVP my feelings would be the same. I would congratulate her and go on.

Edited by lmdjr340
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right its not all about the glory but its about doing what is right, and a few coaches made poor choices out of spite. I know that the Goodpasture catcher played very good in district games and also threw two girls out at second in a 1 to 0 Ballgame should of atleast got all district. I just feel like they took it out on players instead being upset at the other coach. Goodpasture is coached well and they win. Don't take your frustration with the program or coaches and take it out on the players. Maybe I am missing something but would love for anyone to justify what was done.

It's amazing what can be accomplished when no one cares who gets the glory.

Edited by softballghost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your right its not all about the glory but its about doing what is right, and a few coaches made poor choices out of spite. I know that the Goodpasture catcher played very good in district games and also threw two girls out at second in a 1 to 0 Ballgame should of atleast got all district. I just feel like they took it out on players instead being upset at the other coach. Goodpasture is coached well and they win. Don't take your frustration with the program or coaches and take it out on the players. Maybe I am missing something but would love for anyone to justify what was done.

 

Maybe the Whitehouse girl is the most valuable to her team? But for Goodpastures sake I hope the girls don't have as selfish motives as you and your posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selfish? See that's where picking players who don't deserve something they got comes in. See my daughter plays ball and she is a decent player she didn't get an award and rightfully so, she is young and wasnt deserving. The point is you pick the players who deserve something by how the perform in the season, and tournament. And this is why some girls don't get better and some teams can never get passed the better teams. Selfish would be to pick half my team for awards when there are clearly more deserving players. Anyhow we know who the best is and who truly isn't. It is in the championships good day!! [quote name='Vicker' timestamp='1336747367' po ='2797842

Maybe the Whitehouse girl is the most valuable to her team? But for Goodpastures sake I hope the girls don't have as selfish motives as you and your posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...