Jump to content

Batters boxes?


CEJ1972
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You start that and then 15 mins before game time a team realizes that they're out of chalk/paint, what do you do then?  Force a team to forfeit? Wait til someone goes to a hardware store putting you back 30-45 mins at a minimum with a JV game to follow? It'll happen. 

 

I agree teams SHOULD have boxes, but if you say you can't start a game without them then you're in for trouble in some of the lesser funded areas.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think then at least it will give the umpire an idea of where the line was, and also if an umpire was to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box (the olympics are more frequent than this being called) then his defense would be the fact that the batter seen the lines before they were scratched out. If you start the game without a box the umpire will never be able to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box, because techincally, there never was a batter's box. (I will say it one more time just for fun; it never gets called anyway)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think then at least it will give the umpire an idea of where the line was, and also if an umpire was to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box (the olympics are more frequent than this being called) then his defense would be the fact that the batter seen the lines before they were scratched out. If you start the game without a box the umpire will never be able to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box, because techincally, there never was a batter's box. (I will say it one more time just for fun; it never gets called anyway)

 

 

Well...yes it is called but very very seldom because it is seldom that it occurs. If you want to watch players leaving the box go watch some girls softball. If that was called regularly it would change the game as it exists now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...yes it is called but very very seldom because it is seldom that it occurs. If you want to watch players leaving the box go watch some girls softball. If that was called regularly it would change the game as it exists now.

A rule is a rule. Players purposely wipe out the lines, especially fast runners so they can get up in the box on drags. The bigger issue I really have would be batter making contact with the batted ball outside of the box. How can you call that without a box? You cant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think then at least it will give the umpire an idea of where the line was, and also if an umpire was to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box (the olympics are more frequent than this being called) then his defense would be the fact that the batter seen the lines before they were scratched out. If you start the game without a box the umpire will never be able to call a batter out for being out of the batter's box, because techincally, there never was a batter's box. (I will say it one more time just for fun; it never gets called anyway)

At the Silverdale/South Pitt game Monday it did get called for an out:}

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just curious, but does anyone on here know the actual rule? When do you call a batter out for being out of the box? Is it one foot? both feet? Is it where the foot is when contact is made? What if no contact is made? What if the toes are out and the heel is in? What if the batter takes his stance with his back foot on the chalk line(assuming there is one)? Just curious to see the answers, I bet we get a lot of different ones. When I umpired, this was the one thing that fans would yell and scream about constantly, all the freaking time. I'm standing a foot away, I can see very clearly if he is out or in, and yes I called a batter out for this infraction on two separate occassions. It was actually the same player, but two different games and actually two different seasons. Let's hear those answers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be clear, and I think it's usually a bit misunderstood, the foot has to be completely outside of the box and not at all touching the line.  I think most assume that it's if any part of the foot is crossing the line then they're out of the box and that's just not true. Also contact has to be made for it to be an out. 

 

When i was coaching when my kids where coming up, I inquired to the umpire about a kid being out of the box on a pitch that was a good bit outside.  He asked me, "do you want me to watch his feet or watch the ball and swing?" I said both and we had a laugh but in thinking about it, I would assume that's a pretty tough call on most of the guys back there.  It's gotta be pretty egregious I bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I see it as part of the playing field. If there are rules surrounding it then they should be in place. Just like coaches boxes and foul lines. If you hosting a region championship game these things should be painted or chalked. The foul line in the dirt at 1st and 3rd base needs to be there. Not a painted line in the grass that was painted two days before and mowed the day of the game. Now neither one of these things had a bearing on the outcome of the game. Just a pet pev!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the foot has to be over the chalk completely to my understanding. And I also agree that it is hard to ask the home plate umpire see the batter out of the box on the swing. The other umpire in the field can watch this as well though, but might not be close enough to see for sure.

 

 My main concern is the ball hitting the batter while he is out of the box, which should be seen by both umpires. But, like I said earlier, if the box isnt there, you cant call anything as an umpire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...