Jump to content

CC vs AC battle of the 2013 CO district champions


hogdogger
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just posted the preview stats in a new thread, did not want to put them on a thread marked 2013 co-district champs lol...no offense Hog

none taken but we do have a banner at our field and a trophy that says it plus I know it pisses people off when you say co district..expecially the AC faithful. Lol.to be honest I know the kids like that kind of stuff but of it don't say state champion on it I don't put to much in to it..and I still can't believe rings for a district title. That's a stretch for me but that's just my opinion.if you got the money to blow knock yourself out. Edited by hogdogger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

none taken but we do have a banner at our field and a trophy that says it plus I know it pisses people off when you say co district..expecially the AC faithful. Lol.to be honest I know the kids like that kind of stuff but of it don't say state champion on it I don't put to much in to it..and I still can't believe rings for a district title. That's a stretch for me but that's just my opinion.if you got the money to blow knock yourself out.

Well I have 2 things on that, the first is that I did not agree with the whole district champ ring thing just like I dont agree with the whole Co-champ trophies and banners...I feel it works both ways in the sence that I am old school and feel that a ring is sacred to a state championship just like a banner should only be for a true district champ, I have always felt that if you start celebrating Not winning it or start giving awards that mimic state championships (such as a ring) than you kind of lose the hunger for the real thing, this goes for CC celebrating a district championship they did not get as well as AC celebrating a District Championship with hardware ment for a state Championship. I u start celebrating those false accomplishments than you will never achieve the real deal. Thats my .02 on thatt

 

Second is I was told by a parent that the rings themselves were donated by a company that Pennington has intrest in, wheather true or not I dont know, and I also dont know if the teams had to pay to personalize them. So I dont know about the whole money thing on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is what it is and I did not agree with it just like I dont agree with the whole co-champ stuff, but I guess thats the erra we live in now lol

I understand. What is even more mind boggling to me though and I understand I am an OR fan and we are used to winning through the years, but Clinton had banners on their field for going to the 1st round of the playoffs and 2nd round. Now I am not saying these things to put down either program, but to me it just makes the two programs look like they have never been there before and are not used to winning. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


×
  • Create New...