How can you say Waverly is better than Harpeth, when Harpeth beat them both times they played this year? I was not at the C'wood / Harpeth game so I cannot comment on what actually happened or the C'wood's coach reasoning behind not playing his starters. It really was a meaningless game. The top four seeds are much better than the bottom three, Harpeth / Waverly were going to catch each other in the semis with the winner playing c'wood in the finals whether they were seeded two or three. Baring a major upset, the semis and finals should be some good matchups.