I'll allow your assertion that City is playing with a 'majority' of Sophs, and that the contributions of the Juniors are insignificant, and I've already acknowledged they're playing teams with Junior Varsity players (by definition includes varsity substitutes so could include Juniors, but wouldn't think Giles, Tullahoma, etc. would have significant numbers of such playing JV - coaches generally hold out the Varsity 2 deep for their varsity game on Friday). I also doubt that any of the JV teams City has played have MORE Juniors playing significant minutes than City does, so matchups at a minimum are Sophs vs Sophs, but let's say there are more Juniors and it really is a Sophs vs Juniors matchup. NGA is ALSO playing against them according to reports, and thus far results are comparable, which was my point. I'm objecting to the hyperbole of the "flourishing not only in academics but also in sports" assertion, as opposed to what could have been obtained at LCHS (with acknowlegement that even merging the two together wouldn't have affected the LCHS results this year significantly, and the assertion that NGA's 'flourishing' just as well).