Milan Bulldogs

[bulldoggfan]

I am very critical of BOTH schools for not finishing this game the following night. The worst case scenario should of had this game being finished the following Monday. If it could not have been completed on Saturday or Monday, then Milan and Crockett County should be made to deal with a 9 game schedule and the pitfalls that may or may not come with that.

825740031[/snapback]

It was my understanding that Crockett wanted to come back on Saturday and finish the game, but Milan didn't want to do that.

825740037[/snapback]

actually neithier milan or crockett wanted to finish sat because of it being a non region game and next week being a region week they were both worried about injurys and i do not blame the schools what remains is neither school wanted to play with having to play another tough team in the same week again i dont blame crockett or milan either one for their decisions concerning this they are 2 fine teams oh the reason the were worried so much on injurys is if they were to finish that sat the kids would have been sore from the night before with no time to work it out so they did not finish in which case i see win or lose no matter what the score is in that situation i think it should be called a complete game and a winner be declared also it does not show milan as 2 and 0 just one and 0 on the big ones contest it was gave to milan but if u pull up their team page it showes them to be 1/0 unless it has been changed since yesterday

[#1Bulldog]

WHO CARES! ITS OVER! MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIVES! but if u wanna know, the rule book says we win so hate it for ya.

[CoachT]

When ReitzFan posted we did have Milan's record as 2-0 BUT that is because someone had re-entered the scoreafter I had removed it and listed it as Suspended. So, you both are right. It is now 1-0 again, or at least it was when I last looked.

[bulldoggfan]

When ReitzFan posted we did have Milan's record as 2-0 BUT that is because someone had re-entered the scoreafter I had removed it and listed it as Suspended. So, you both are right. It is now 1-0 again, or at least it was when I last looked.

825740128[/snapback]

ty for the clarification on that like i said i knew it was 1 and 0 yesterday again ty forthe clarrification

[Purple & Gold Standard]

well even though I still think Milan should have played at the Rock, I have to agree with the Milan fans here. To finish the game, it takes BOTH coaches to agree on a date. If milan offered some dates then CC could have accepted them. It`s a shame that it can`t be finished, but undoubtedly neither team could find a good mutual open date. Time to forget about that and move on.

825738666[/snapback]

Personally,I don't think the coaches should have a say....That's the problem you have now....I also don't think either team should be scheduling anyone else...The game was Milan-Crockett Co.....I think the TSSAA should have stepped in and made a date and said play or both take a forfeit...It's not fair to either Huntingdon or Westview for Milan to be able to drop Crockett Co and replace them with a team that has no chance to even come close to beating them...The same for the teams in Crockett's region IF they reschedule and play a rent-a-win team...And oh by the way,a player can be hurt in an easy game or practice for that matter,so that argument just doesn't fly...The weather was bad that night no doubt,but everyone else either finished or rescheduled for Saturday night..I know I was in Dresden and waited around 45 minutes for kickoff and about the same for the second half to start..And Union City had to wait over an hour for the second half to start....Point is they finished the game and BOTH were non-region games....Looking back,and hindsight is 20/20,the game should have been completed on Saturday(It was announced at the OC-Dresden game that fans should stop by the ticket gate and pick up a ticket stub for entrance into the stadium the next day had the game been halted)The game officials and school officials had a plan for that game...Obviously that wasn't the case at Milan....

[bulldoggfan]

Personally,I don't think the coaches should have a say....That's the problem you have now....I also don't think either team should be scheduling anyone else...The game was Milan-Crockett Co.....I think the TSSAA should have stepped in and made a date and said play or both take a forfeit...It's not fair to either Huntingdon or Westview for Milan to be able to drop Crockett Co and replace them with a team that has no chance to even come close to beating them...The same for the teams in Crockett's region IF they reschedule and play a rent-a-win team...And oh by the way,a player can be hurt in an easy game or practice for that matter,so that argument just doesn't fly...The weather was bad that night no doubt,but everyone else either finished or rescheduled for Saturday night..I know I was in Dresden and waited around 45 minutes for kickoff and about the same for the second half to start..And Union City had to wait over an hour for the second half to start....Point is they finished the game and BOTH were non-region games....Looking back,and hindsight is 20/20,the game should have been completed on Saturday(It was announced at the OC-Dresden game that fans should stop by the ticket gate and pick up a ticket stub for entrance into the stadium the next day had the game been halted)The game officials and school officials had a plan for that game...Obviously that wasn't the case at Milan....

825740474[/snapback]

i have to atleast partially aggree with what u said about it not being up to the coaches either finish play sat or call it and the score should determin winner dont get me wrong im a milan fan but i would have this opinion reguardless of who wins and to me no matter which team it was coming out on top i mean that what everybody else dont right they finished or called it