Rankings

[ibreakthelaw19]

the rankings are based on how far a team made it in the state tournament...not how good they are (compared to other teams) because if that were the case franklin should be ranked higher than siegel and tullahoma because they beat them both

[hardball03]

that was the final eurosport rankings

 

No, not yours......the one that had a longer list within each classification.

 

Even the Eurosport rankings leave something to be desired. It can get irritating

when you see teams ranked behind others whom they have soundly defeated

during the year.

 

The imbalance among districts and regions should be considered and understood

that sometimes there are more than two strong teams that will unfortunately never

go to regions and state.......that are certainly better than those who are fortunate

enough to have a weak district and or region.

 

There seems to be a "recency rule" that is applied with the Eurosport rankings, however even with recency there seems to be some selective memory.

 

There is apparently a committee that decides these, which unfortunately creates

some "friendly" bias.

 

Fortunately and generally the number 1 team is certainly deserving......beyond

that there is not much validity.......just irritation and bragging.

[siegelplayer4]

anyone who doesn't think JPII is the best team in the state is out of their mind.

A little cocky there aren't we? Not to say that you're wrong but really is there any way of comparing JPII to some of the other top teams in the state?????

[VolunteerGeneral]

final eurosport poll

 

 

AA/A

1 fra

2 catholic

3 ccs

4 notre dame

5 chuckey-doak

6 columbia a

7 cpa

8 grace

9 hume-fogg

10 david lipscomb

11 liberty

 

 

 

OK...I`m open to hear your reasoning for picking Liberty ahead of Madison Academic.

[mjuhb]

OK...I`m open to hear your reasoning for picking Liberty ahead of Madison Academic.

that was the final eurosport poll not mine

[mustangs2005]

that was the final eurosport poll not mine

 

 

Note: * Reflects Games Reported To SIS - (nn) Current Rank Current

Rank Team Overall*

W-L-T Previous

Rank Results*

10/23/05

To

10/30/05 Results*

10/30/05

Final rankings:

 

 

To Present

1 Franklin Road Acad. 20-4-3 1 10/26 W 3-0 Tour Chatt. Christian(03)

10/27 W 5-0 Tour Chuckey-Doak(05)

10/29 W 2-0 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

2 Knox Catholic 20-3-1 4 10/26 W 5-1 Tour Columbia Acdy(06)

10/27 W 2-0 Tour Notre Dame(04)

10/29 L 0-2 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

3 Chatt. Christian 18-3-3 2 10/26 L 0-3 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

4 Notre Dame 11-10-4 3 10/26 W 3-0 Away Jackson Magnet(11)

10/27 L 0-2 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

5 Chuckey-Doak 19-1-2 5 10/26 W 3-0 Home McNairy Central

10/27 L 0-5 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

6 Columbia Acdy 14-8-0 6 10/26 L 1-5 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

7 CPA 14-9-0 7

8 Grace Baptist Acdy 10-6-2 8

9 Hume-Fogg 10-4-1 9

10 David Lipscomb 7-6-2 10

11 Jackson Magnet 16-3-1 11 10/26 L 0-3 Home Notre Dame(04)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liberty not ranked.

 

 

Note: * Reflects Games Reported To SIS - (nn) Current Rank Current

Rank Team Overall*

W-L-T Previous

Rank Results*

10/23/05

To

10/30/05 Results*

10/30/05

Final rankings:

To Present

1 Franklin Road Acad. 20-4-3 1 10/26 W 3-0 Tour Chatt. Christian(03)

10/27 W 5-0 Tour Chuckey-Doak(05)

10/29 W 2-0 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

2 Knox Catholic 20-3-1 4 10/26 W 5-1 Tour Columbia Acdy(06)

10/27 W 2-0 Tour Notre Dame(04)

10/29 L 0-2 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

3 Chatt. Christian 18-3-3 2 10/26 L 0-3 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

4 Notre Dame 11-10-4 3 10/26 W 3-0 Away Jackson Magnet(11)

10/27 L 0-2 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

5 Chuckey-Doak 19-1-2 5 10/26 W 3-0 Home McNairy Central

10/27 L 0-5 Tour Franklin Road Acad.(01)

6 Columbia Acdy 14-8-0 6 10/26 L 1-5 Tour Knox Catholic(02)

7 CPA 14-9-0 7

8 Grace Baptist Acdy 10-6-2 8

9 Hume-Fogg 10-4-1 9

10 David Lipscomb 7-6-2 10

11 Jackson Magnet 16-3-1 11 10/26 L 0-3 Home Notre Dame(04)