redbaron515 Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 shims4, watch the language....no need for it, and it wont be tolerated on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiec996 Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 the guy I played at the Rotary that played for Science hill (john something) seemed like he was much better than a number 6. I was told that they stacked and after watching them I can say that they did but I was kind of curious who was their real number one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cutters Crazies Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 My opinion = Chris Smith #1 Alexander Greer #2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingman10 Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 shims4, watch the language....no need for it, and it wont be tolerated on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usckk Posted April 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 the guy I played at the Rotary that played for Science hill (john something) seemed like he was much better than a number 6. I was told that they stacked and after watching them I can say that they did but I was kind of curious who was their real number one HE's John Story. He's supposed to play 6. When SH played against DB, they put Alex at 1 and Chris at 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nation_supp89 Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 HE's John Story. He's supposed to play 6. When SH played against DB, they put Alex at 1 and Chris at 2. I think the only reason they think they can justify putting Chris somewhere other than 1 is the fact that he's only a freshman. I still think he is better than their #1 and #2 tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usckk Posted April 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Chris played 1 last year. The reason he's playing 2 is that he hasn't played that much in the fall or winter, while the 1 guy played all year. Chris goes through times when he really stunk, so its possible for him to play 2 or 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgs2 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Since Siegel and Science Hill are locks for the final, let me throw one team at you. Id ask all the Siegel lovers if they have ever heard of Bearden. You might want to consider them a threat to your state title after Saturdays match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cutters Crazies Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 (edited) Since Siegel and Science Hill are locks for the final, let me throw one team at you. Id ask all the Siegel lovers if they have ever heard of Bearden. You might want to consider them a threat to your state title after Saturdays match. lol talk the trash we can handle it...however your not exactly in a position to talk since you will be seeing either TN High or Science Hill before you even make it to state. You guys are a solid team, we knew that though and thats why we invited you up here to play. Also, thats not the lineup you will see at state either....Siegel didn't play their #4 player in that match so doubles will be different and slide that guy into singles. Edited April 22, 2006 by Cutters Crazies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nation_supp89 Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Since Siegel and Science Hill are locks for the final, let me throw one team at you. Id ask all the Siegel lovers if they have ever heard of Bearden. You might want to consider them a threat to your state title after Saturdays match. when did we say we were a lock for the final? Slide in siegel's missing player in singles AND doubles and its a new match altogether. Bearden is a solid team and they won't be overlooked. They do have a tougher road to state than siegel does though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgs2 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Im just pointing out what happened. I dont think u thought much of Bearden at all. They arent mentioned once on here. Im not talking trash. Just mentioning on the 8th page of this, that u might want to mention us in your Siegel, Science Hill, Brentwood debate. Slip your 4 in today and we still beat u TODAY, could be different down the road. The playoffs will help us because we are weak at 6 and 3 doubles. I think Hunter and Kyle could go either way. Your # 2 wouldnt beat Taylor, he dominated him . I think the 3 is a toss up. The 4 also . I think the doubles teams lean toward Bearden. Well see what happens, but u have to admit u were way overconfident today and it will be interesting IF we meet again. Well have our hands full to get there If we played tomorrow with your 4 in the lineup with the 5 singles 2 double format, do you really think u would be the favorite.. Im not saying u cant beat us, but the lean is toward Bearden. I hope we play again, if so it will be in the state semis Had a god time today, good luck the rest of the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nation_supp89 Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 (edited) Im just pointing out what happened. I dont think u thought much of Bearden at all. They arent mentioned once on here. Im not talking trash. Just mentioning on the 8th page of this, that u might want to mention us in your Siegel, Science Hill, Brentwood debate. Slip your 4 in today and we still beat u TODAY, could be different down the road. The playoffs will help us because we are weak at 6 and 3 doubles. I think Hunter and Kyle could go either way. Your # 2 wouldnt beat Taylor, he dominated him . I think the 3 is a toss up. The 4 also . I think the doubles teams lean toward Bearden. Well see what happens, but u have to admit u were way overconfident today and it will be interesting IF we meet again. Well have our hands full to get there If we played tomorrow with your 4 in the lineup with the 5 singles 2 double format, do you really think u would be the favorite.. Im not saying u cant beat us, but the lean is toward Bearden. I hope we play again, if so it will be in the state semis Had a god time today, good luck the rest of the way This would be the difference with our 4 seed. First of all, that moves our actual number 5 (who played 4 today) down to the 5 spot. Our 4 would have a better chance winning and our 5 would have a better chance winning. Second of all, doubles would be completely switched around. Our 2 doubles played 1 today because normally our 4 seed plays w/ kyle at 1 doubles. Just stating some facts that's all. I agree about our 2, he got dominated (as usual)...kyle and hunter is a toss up. I think the three goes to siegel, 4 is a toss up, and 5 goes to siegel. Doubles would be a completely different story though as siegel's ACTUAL number 1 doubles beat trinity's today. I meant to ask, what ended up happening with bearden and webb? Edited April 23, 2006 by nation_supp89 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.