Jump to content

Scott VS. LA


Bassfishing_205
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree the refs were bad on both parts but really bad against the highlanders. LA is a good football team. The scott D REALLY REALLY impressed me tonight. Hey everyone who said scott had no chance thats 1 down 2 to go

Kingston is this week and this is gonna be the game to decide if the highlanders go to the playoffs Good luck GO BIG RED

WHY TO GO BIG RED ! :thumb: GREAT GAME BOTH TEAMS SHS YOU FOUND A WAY TO WIN THATS A BEGINNING NOW YOU ALL NEED TO BUILD ON THAT GET BACK TO WORK AND GET READY FOR YELLOW JACKETS.

 

THE LOOKED GREAT AT TIMES GOT TO GET BETTER :)

THE D WAS MUCH IMPROVED STILL LOOKED LIKE SOME ARE WAITING ON OTHERS TO MAKE PLAYS MAKE THEM YOUR SELF. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey at least SCott won't finish last in the region this year. Sixth is an improvement.

u mean 5th or even 4th is they can beat Kingston 4th if they dont then they will beat AC and finish 5th so dont run ur mouth and if im not mistaken u said in the LA VS scott thread neither team had D scott had D and played with it you can ask any player on the LA team if they had good D. LA had the Refs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the refs almost lost scott the game but scott didn't lose their intensity and pulled out a good win

What game where you watching or playing in ? Scott Co. had at least 5 or 6 delay of game penalties. I can't recall a flag that the refs threw against Scott that helped LA. I do recall the 5 turnovers that LA committed that resulted in 17 pts. of the 23 the Highlanders scored. The only pts Scott scored by their own merits was the last drive of the game that eat 6 mins of the 8 that was left in the game. LA could have tied with FG or won outright but fumbled away their chances. WHY CAN'T SCOTT CO. PLAYERS JUST TAKE IT AS A WIN AND QUIT RUNNING YOUR MOUTHS .Enjoy your win and early X-mas present. Good luck in your run to the play-offs you 'll need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
×
  • Create New...