girls tennis

[siegelplayer4]

QUOTE(TNtnns_07 @ May 24 2007 - 09:45 PM) 826466482[/snapback]actually no im not...but i do play for the boys team...so i have no darn clue waht happened

 

well the point was i have no clue why a team wouldn't have their doubles lineup in and the blame for that default seems pretty justified. it's sad for the girls but i also thought it funny that the same doubles team that was the deciding factor in the tennessee high siegel match lost their first round in state. so hey now i guess we 'll never know who would have won

[10sstar]

QUOTE(siegelplayer4 @ May 25 2007 - 12:14 PM) 826466940[/snapback]well the point was i have no clue why a team wouldn't have their doubles lineup in and the blame for that default seems pretty justified. it's sad for the girls but i also thought it funny that the same doubles team that was the deciding factor in the tennessee high siegel match lost their first round in state. so hey now i guess we 'll never know who would have won

 

No we won't know for sure, but it's a pretty good guess that the Siegel doubles team that beat Farragut (who beat the Conleys of TN high) would have also beat the Conleys. If the Conleys were their true #2 doubles, had they been beaten by their own #1 doubles? This leads me back to my earlier question that never got answered about singles: did they play challenge matches? If their #1 doubles usually beat their #2 doubles, then it's a pretty good guess that Siegel's #1 doubles would have beat their #2 doubles, since Siegel's #2 doubles beat their #1 doubles. It's also a pretty good guess that the lineup wasn't in because they had changed it so many times they even confused themselves. Decision: Siegel.