Region 5 brackets

[thsdad]

I UNDERSTAND THAT ZIAD AND MITCHELL NEVER MET EACH OTHER DURING THE YEAR NOR DID THEY HAVE ANY COMMON OPPONENTS.SO HOW DO YOU PUT LAST YEARS REGION CHAMPION AND 3 TIME STATE QUALIFIER SEEDED 2ND?JUST CURIOUS,SEEMS LIKE AN ERROR ON SOMEONE'S PART.GOOD LUCK WILDCATS! COUSY MOORE

 

COUSY..you be sure to stay awake this week...see you in the morning...

[hougie08]

How has this happend???

 

2 returning region champs @ 130 and 285 not seeded first. What criteria was used to seed Aboulmouna (Tullahoma) under Mitchell (Riverdale)? I am really confused to how this has happend and who allowed this to be overlooked, if it is incorrect. The only thing I can come to for the heavyweight is a common opponent that Roper (Tullahoma) has lost to prior to his injury that Bain (Warren Co.) has defeated if that is the case then the seed at 285 is correct. I believe someone got fooled for the 130 seeds to be this wrong. Please explain if you were present at the meeting.

 

 

There was a big argument about this at the seeding meeting. Nat's been out half the season because of eligibility issues, but had a better record percentage than Ziad (6-1 vs 22-4 ?). Pretty sure it came down to Coach Vaughn mentioning that Ziad's never beaten Nat, I believe the two wrestled twice last year. But we'll see tomorrow. I'm looking forward to it, I think it'll be a great match.

[siegeltackle101]

from what i remember in my old age... the criteria for seeding has always been 1) region record 2) head to head record 3) record vs common opponents and 4) either a battle royale with the last man standing getting the highest seed for his kid or coin flip... PBD did you happen to see any of this during your time in the vents at siegel

[matcat]

I believe Ziad Aboulmouna (Tullahoma) answered all questions in his finals match.

 

siegeltackle101

 

Curious to how many seeding meetings you have actually been in???

 

I would would say not many, stick with AAU and you will always be successful LOL