Jump to content

East Hickman goes to Summit


headfake4u
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It will be interesting. EH will probably be the youngest team next to our own that we play this year. That will take away a lot of the discrepancy we've encountered. The common opponent was Loretto and we lost while EH won. It will be close if Summit can pick a few of all the passes coming our way. A few pick 6's and this game could go either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting. EH will probably be the youngest team next to our own that we play this year. That will take away a lot of the discrepancy we've encountered. The common opponent was Loretto and we lost while EH won. It will be close if Summit can pick a few of all the passes coming our way. A few pick 6's and this game could go either way.

East will dominate ,I am sure of that......but if East does not get the defense together it may be interesting, for some strange reason we have a non existant defense and every team we play hangs big numbers on us,Our team is still under the belief that the spread offense works for us.NOT...If Coach will mix in a little ground and pound good things will happen. If not we will be one dimensional as we have been. One good comparison for our teams, the majority of East main starters are sophmores

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East will dominate ,I am sure of that......but if East does not get the defense together it may be interesting, for some strange reason we have a non existant defense and every team we play hangs big numbers on us,Our team is still under the belief that the spread offense works for us.NOT...If Coach will mix in a little ground and pound good things will happen. If not we will be one dimensional as we have been. One good comparison for our teams, the majority of East main starters are sophmores

 

 

East won't "dominate" anybody, though you may squeak by in this one. I hope not though. I pick Summit's first win in school history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East won't "dominate" anybody, though you may squeak by in this one. I hope not though. I pick Summit's first win in school history.

 

 

At any point will anyone from East Hickmans mother be involved in a quasi-wrestling match?..............................if so, East wins by 189 points............or will they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheatham County tried to schedule East Hickman on numerous occasions last November but your coach rejected the invite to play the Cubs. Why? East Hickman would have gotten hammered in a VERY BAD WAY!

Hickman will be glad to play you. Easy wins are nice. Anyways...... East will probably lose again and they will be only few more losses away from another rebuilding year. I am sure of that. But I hope for a East win but dont count on it..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...