Jump to content

Creekwood @ Camden


CamdenBottoms
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Creek Wood has won 4 in a row and still has an outside shot at winning the district title if they are able to beat Camden and get some help from Cheatham County versus Harpeth. Aaron Lee in my opinion is the best quarterback in the district. Wakeman, Felts, Taylor, Byrd, and Potts are all excellent contributors. McConnell is a stud on defense. Camden has the district's projected MVP in Trae White. Hudson is a great quarterback who throws a good ball. Blackburn is a stud at linebacker.

 

I'd expect this game to be a shootout with the first team to 35 winning. I'll go with Camden at home 35-31. These are going to be 2 of the 4 teams from this district to reach the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a look at the 11-AA scenarios going into the final week of the season:

 

If Camden beats Creek Wood they are District Champions; Harpeth would be #2

 

If Harpeth beats Cheatham County and Creek Wood beats Camden then Harpeth is District Champions; Creek Wood would be #2

 

If Cheatham County beats Harpeth and Creek Wood beats Camden then Creek Wood is District Champions; Camden would be #2

 

--------------------------------------------------

 

I look for Camden, Creek Wood, Harpeth, and Cheatham County to all be a part of the 2011 TSSAA State Playoffs :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't forget the sleeper of the district Harpeth!!!McWright can run and throw camden got lucky on some turnovers take that away and what?

The game between Camden and Harpeth really should have been a blowout. Up 14 to 0 in the first Quarter. Harpeth showed some heart to comeback from that and go into the half tied 21-21 but they could not play with Camden in the second half. Camden gets stronger as the game progresses. Their conditioning has won them more than one game this year. We can all find excuses for a loss. Harpeth got tired in the 4th. you could see them slow down a step and that gave Camden the edge they needed. Harpeth is a fine team this year, Quite a bit better than last year. Good luck with Cheatham Co. Go Lions

Edited by wmatlock1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game between Camden and Harpeth really should have been a blowout. Up 14 to 0 in the first Quarter. Harpeth showed some heart to comeback from that and go into the half tied 21-21 but they could not play with Camden in the second half. Camden gets stronger as the game progresses. Their conditioning has won them more than one game this year. We can all find excuses for a loss. Harpeth got tired in the 4th. you could see them slow down a step and that gave Camden the edge they needed. Harpeth is a fine team this year, Quite a bit better than last year. Good luck with Cheatham Co. Go Lions

You must have been at the trailer park when the game was going on! I got news for ya. CAMDEN'S NOT THAT GOOD We fumble the ball on the opening kick off And gave you 7 there. Then rite before half we go 70 yards and miss a fg. Then late in the game we fumble on the 3 yard line. Take away those turn overs and the miss fg and we give Camden all they want. GO CREEKWOOD!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have been at the trailer park when the game was going on! I got news for ya. CAMDEN'S NOT THAT GOOD We fumble the ball on the opening kick off And gave you 7 there. Then rite before half we go 70 yards and miss a fg. Then late in the game we fumble on the 3 yard line. Take away those turn overs and the miss fg and we give Camden all they want. GO CREEKWOOD!!!!!!

I just put on my Waders and a Bag of Popcorn on after reading this.Defense causes turnnovers.And back to Camden vs Creekwood thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have been at the trailer park when the game was going on! I got news for ya. CAMDEN'S NOT THAT GOOD We fumble the ball on the opening kick off And gave you 7 there. Then rite before half we go 70 yards and miss a fg. Then late in the game we fumble on the 3 yard line. Take away those turn overs and the miss fg and we give Camden all they want. GO CREEKWOOD!!!!!!

Just some more what ifs and might have been. Camden won by 14 and held Harpets scoreless in the second half. you lost so quit crying. Going 70 yards and not scoreing is absolutely nothing to brag about. Harpeth is definately not that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK funtoplay. Come and watch the game and bring a banner that says creekwood by 10 so you can shamefully burn it in the parking lot after the game. Oh yeah bring a good notepad so you can write down all the excuses why Creekwood lost. You sure dont want to forget any when you start to post Friday night or Saturday. Sorry, you are a Harpeth fan. Well thats OK you can take your pad to Cheatham Co. You will need it there as well.Cheatham Co by 12. Camden by 17

Edited by wmatlock1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...