Jump to content

Sequatchie Co vs Grundy Co


SCPRIDE30
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know what to tell you. I was told they had some good names of coaches around the valley last time that applied, but weren't given consideration. Seems they have some major issues going on currently.

Bass my co-workers say if that Tate man stays, they might not have enough to field a team. Gonna be a lot of kids leave. I work with 4 people who have kids in the middle school, and they say their kids will not play for that Tate man.. Major issues is an understatement. Them Bryant boys weren't so bad after all. And i find it hilarious that coaches like jacketbacker say the schedule is harder now.. I guess they forgot Notre Dame and Signal was rolling when Bryants were in charge.. This team would be at least .500 if Bryants were still at the helm. Not to mention Sequatchie and Bledsoe was good. If I remember right, them Bryant boys beat Bledsoe the year they played alcoa at bledsoe in the 3rd round. 

Edited by allblack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bass my co-workers say if that Tate man stays, they might not have enough to field a team. Gonna be a lot of kids leave. I work with 4 people who have kids in the middle school, and they say their kids will not play for that Tate man.. Major issues is an understatement. Them Bryant boys weren't so bad after all. And i find it hilarious that coaches like jacketbacker say the schedule is harder now.. I guess they forgot Notre Dame and Signal was rolling when Bryants were in charge.. This team would be at least .500 if Bryants were still at the helm. Not to mention Sequatchie and Bledsoe was good. If I remember right, them Bryant boys beat Bledsoe the year they played alcoa at bledsoe in the 3rd round.

I think if what your sayings true people up here need to get off our rears and go before the administration and board and speak our peace. But that's just the thing everyone hear talks about things but aren't willing to stand up for them or our children. Numbers speak loud and clear on issues but just have to have the people willing to stick together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bass my co-workers say if that Tate man stays, they might not have enough to field a team. Gonna be a lot of kids leave. I work with 4 people who have kids in the middle school, and they say their kids will not play for that Tate man.. Major issues is an understatement. Them Bryant boys weren't so bad after all. And i find it hilarious that coaches like jacketbacker say the schedule is harder now.. I guess they forgot Notre Dame and Signal was rolling when Bryants were in charge.. This team would be at least .500 if Bryants were still at the helm. Not to mention Sequatchie and Bledsoe was good. If I remember right, them Bryant boys beat Bledsoe the year they played alcoa at bledsoe in the 3rd round.

What did you think about the new bumper boat ride at Disney? Pretty cool isn't it? I'm not sure if the Bryant's would be .500 this season or not. I think they would have won 3-4 games with the schedule this year though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the names that applied there's no way Casey should've gotten that job. I tried to express my concern to the powers to be. Now with our non qualified Director of Schools' brother (also on the school board) being on Casey's staff & his bff...Nick Saban couldn't get the job here over the all cocky Casey.

I don't know what to tell you. I was told they had some good names of coaches around the valley last time that applied, but weren't given consideration. Seems they have some major issues going on currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We did beat them that year. I've heard numerous kids that are leaving, but kids aren't the powers to be concern. They will leave ole Casey out there with 10 players. He told them in the locker room when he played he would've ran all over them..maybe they will let him suit up and be the 11th man.

Bass my co-workers say if that Tate man stays, they might not have enough to field a team. Gonna be a lot of kids leave. I work with 4 people who have kids in the middle school, and they say their kids will not play for that Tate man.. Major issues is an understatement. Them Bryant boys weren't so bad after all. And i find it hilarious that coaches like jacketbacker say the schedule is harder now.. I guess they forgot Notre Dame and Signal was rolling when Bryants were in charge.. This team would be at least .500 if Bryants were still at the helm. Not to mention Sequatchie and Bledsoe was good. If I remember right, them Bryant boys beat Bledsoe the year they played alcoa at bledsoe in the 3rd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
×
  • Create New...