Guest cornpop Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Clarksville beats Ryan 38-29 ina great match from both sides. The 135 match was exciting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trackman Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Interesting. Do you know get individual results? Were there forfeits? Did both squads go at full strength? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckLateral Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Results of the match as printed in today's Clarksville Leaf Chronicle ( the spelling is theirs, not mine). However, the final score doesn't seem to add up to what they show as the individual match results. Clarksville High 38, Father Ryan 29 171: Wade Hadley (CHS) defeated Mayo (FR) 15-0 189: M. Pease (CHS) defeated Greenwood (FR) 2-18 215: Nathan Jones (CHS) lost to Hover (FR) 6-3 275: Jason Pennington (CHS) pinned Roberts (FR) :39 103: Jeremy Chandler (CHS) pinned by Dunning (FR) 3:20 112: Joseph Overstreet (CHS) won by forfeit 119: Sean Carter (CHS) pinned by Hillar (FR) 4:42 125: Dillon Jennings (CHS) pinned Oda (FR) 1:52 130: A.J. Haynes (CHS) pinned Oda (FR) 4:39 135: Richard Weakley (CHS) lost to Dunning (FR) 13-4 140: John Vandal (CHS) defeated Myers (FR) 11-4 145: Chris Turner (CHS) defeated Clark (FR) 7-4 152: Brian Perry (CHS) defeated Stark (FR) 16-1 160: Jim Weakley (CHS) defeated Welden (FR) 4-3 [Edited by BuckLateral on 1-14-03 10:45A] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trackman Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Thanks. The paper probably got winner and loser of one match mixed up. Clarksville seems to be a better duals team, but didn't they lose to MBA recently? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegatling Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 What in the world, those scores do not sound correct at all. Are you sure that Greenwood got teched? They forfeited at 112? That doesn't sound right at all. Can someone double check and make sure that it is the right scores for the match ups? [Edited by thegatling on 1-14-03 11:56A] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pummeler Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 i doubled checked gatling and i found out that no one cares and coach bray likes the village people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverbullet Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 It looks like father Ryan had a few lineup changes. Adams was not at 171 and did not wrestle. Lomas was not at 215 and did not wrestle. Hoover was not at 275, he was at 215. Hiller was not at 112, he was at 119. Mondelli was not at 119 and did not wrestle. Dunning was not at 130, he was at 135. Medlin was not at 135 and did not wrestle. As far as the results reported. It looks to me like the winners were switched at 152 and 189. That puts the score correct and I find it hard to believe Stark and Greenwood lost. SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweattolose Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Yes the results are switched on 152 and 189. But as far as line-ups being changed due to an injury to Donahue at 160, the entire Clarksville lineup was bumped up from the 135 to 160. Vandal at 140 Turner at 145 Perry at 152 and Weakley at 160. Pease wrestled at 189 is a true 171. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatkat Posted January 14, 2003 Report Share Posted January 14, 2003 Stark DID win and Greenwood did as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatWizard87 Posted January 15, 2003 Report Share Posted January 15, 2003 yeah stark one and so did greenwood the results must have been switched around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.