Jump to content

Perry County vs Temple


behappy229
 Share

Recommended Posts

To the Temple team I want to say how proud you should be. You wanted the game more than Perry County and played like you wanted it. Your team will no doubt bring home the gold because you have what it takes. The sad thing is the boys who got put in with only 30 seconds left on the clock. These boys should had gotten to play at least 2 minutes or more. I mean what would it hurt.The score was 20 points difference in 2 minutes to go. Every child should had gotten to play at least 2 minutes with this much of a lead and this is a chance that alot of kids will never get again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest redrooster

All we heard about was how Temple wouldn't be able to control your post players...they not only controlled them, they totally took them out of their game and limited PC to 52 points...So much for Jake and company not being able to handle the BIG guys!!! Remember the Ezel game last year? Same story, another win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm from McEwen and I went to see Temple and Perry Co. and from what I saw Perry Co. was no match. The Skogen kids are great players. The point guard from Temple had really good handles. He embarrased some kid from PC and all my teamates could do was laugh. Well, I just wanted to congratulate you and say you are the best team in single A handsdown. :(:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a freaking joke!! Perry Co by 50 and Mitchell by 25---you would make a good comedian, no actually people would laugh your butt off the stage with acts like that.

 

I'm not saying Temple will the GOLD ball, but...Mitchell could not beat them by 25pts. As for Perry Co, they might beat Temple 1-2 times out of 10, at best. When you make it this far, there are no excuses.

 

BTW, I'm from the Knoxville area, not Chattanooga so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No excuses for Perry County. We did not play our best game. If we had everyone would have seen a very different ball game. I don't think that we would have beat Temple by 50. That's a little crazy. It might have also have been a different game if we had been able to shoot 30 free throws instead of 6. I am not saying that would have made us win or using that as an excuse. It just seemed the foul situation, especially in the first half, was a little off. Temple has a very good ball team. I do believe they will have their hands full with Mitchell. I watched the Mitchell game and was very impressed. Anyway, we are proud of our Perry County teams win or lose. No matter what we are VIKING fans and always will be. Good luck to the remaining teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

perry co. fans never cease to amaze me. get your share of the calls?? The reason more fouls were called on perry co. is because they could not keep up with temple's players. and perry co did not make temple foul them they just settled for shots. I guess we expected you guys to whine about calls cuz in the district you get all of the calls. One more point, the refs in this game finally called some offensive fouls on jackson he uses one arm to dribble and the other to push off, its just not called in 12A. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to fight with you about this because it is not worth it. Our season is over. We can now look to next year. However, I don't think you will find any fans anywhere, not just in Perry County, that don't see things in a one-sided way. It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people bash Perry County fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...