vandyfan Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 They will be attempted but none made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warriorettes23 Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 (edited) i boy daniel puckett will dunk it at least 3 times and one of them will be in either one of the anderson brothers eye. and one of the ncs team mates will have to pick up his eyes after the dunk. Edited February 3, 2004 by warriorettes23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justwatching Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 The fact that there are no "Anderson Brothers" is one problem -- but the main problem with that post is that it is just stupid to think that anything you said is at all possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warriorettes23 Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 (edited) if there is no anderson bothers then what are they because i remember from last year that they had brothers on the team. he will have 3 dunks minimum and if you don't think that is possible than you have not seen daniel puckett play this year or at all. Congratulations to my boy daniel for making the 1000 point make last friday off a dunk. Edited February 3, 2004 by warriorettes23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCSHater Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Puckett will have maybe 1 but no more than that, because if you think an NCS player is gonna let Daniel dunk it without trying to tackle him you are crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orangeandblue Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 if there is no anderson bothers then what are they because i remember from last year that they had brothers on the team. he will have 3 dunks minimum and if you don't think that is possible than you have not seen daniel puckett play this year or at all. Congratulations to my boy daniel for making the 1000 point make last friday off a dunk. There are no brothers on this team this year or last year. There are two Anderson's on the team, but not related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCS03 Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Why do you keep starting these pointless threads?? McEwen fans sometimes you make yourselves look like retards when you get on here and start saying stuff about the Anderson brothers when there are no Anderson brothers. Then you say one of the Andersons is gonna get dunked on even though Jarretts not even playing. Please just be happy that your team (Daniel Puckett) is doing good and stop making yourselves look dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big48Eagle Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 Seriously. This vandyfan character needs to go take a walk or somethin. I'm sure it will be a great game, but who cares if Anderson has something planned, or who's better between Dave and Puckett, or whether or not there'll be a fight. Come on man, you know better than that. I look forward to seeing another close game tonight. JA is not playing and won't be for a while. Dave will not get dunked on, mostly due to the fact he doesn't play post D. If Puckett does dunk it will be on the fast break, and i wouldn't count on seeing it more than once if at all. Anyways your threads are pointless so lets all just enjoy a good game and take it from there. Will be leaving before too long so good luck to both teams... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsfootballfan10 Posted February 3, 2004 Report Share Posted February 3, 2004 And if Puckett does dunk it, it will be on a fast break because he is SOFT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOWDEN Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Just to answer the prediction on dunks: Puckett was intentionall fouled on a break away dunk and he dunked twice more while the offense was running! Looks like three was a good prediction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghr1961 Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Yea he's soft, he only slammed 2 in about 3 of NCS's players faces. By the way, I believe he had 28. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big48Eagle Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Regardless if you're a fan of McEwen, NCS, or Pokemon you should know that by no means was the foul called in the 2nd intentional. NCS's player grabbed at the ball and at the same time brought Puckett down, but i guess the fall was so hard the ref felt compelled to make the call. Say what you will, it was a bad call. I will say this though. Puckett had one big dunk from an out of bounds oop passed from close to 30 feet away, so that kind of killed the soft idea, as well as a post up and 1 dunk in the 4th. Never got close on the fast break, "intentional foul", attempt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts