Jump to content

LazIndex 1A Rankings & Predictions Semifinals


LazIndexTN
 Share

Recommended Posts

1A

34 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.562 ; Power: 118.97 ; Sched. Rank: 224 (3)

 

46 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.476 ; Power: 118.34 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (32)

 

63 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.424 ; Power: 109.40 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (23)

 

65 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.417 ; Power: 114.16 ; Sched. Rank: 282 (19)

 

83 (5) COALFIELD ; Rating:  1.343 ; Power: 108.65 ; Sched. Rank: 259 (7)

 

103 (6) UNION CITY ; Rating:  1.272 ; Power: 107.22 ; Sched. Rank: 288 (21)

 

114 (7) NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN ; Rating:  1.235 ; Power: 104.58 ; Sched. Rank: 274 (14)

 

121 (8) HUNTINGDON ; Rating:  1.215 ; Power: 107.68 ; Sched. Rank: 253 (5)

 

128 (9) ONEIDA ; Rating:  1.155 ; Power: 97.83 ; Sched. Rank: 181 (1)

 

133 (10) COLUMBIA ACADEMY ; Rating:  1.130 ; Power: 95.07 ; Sched. Rank: 324 (44)

 

156 (11) HARRIMAN ; Rating:  1.071 ; Power: 98.08 ; Sched. Rank: 269 (12)

 

165 (12) TROUSDALE COUNTY (Hartsville) ; Rating:  1.047 ; Power: 94.85 ; Sched. Rank: 316 (36)

 

168 (13) PEABODY (Trenton) ; Rating:  1.037 ; Power: 95.59 ; Sched. Rank: 268 (11)

 

176 (14) GORDONSVILLE ; Rating:  1.013 ; Power: 91.94 ; Sched. Rank: 294 (22)

 

181 (15) FAYETTEVILLE ; Rating:  0.998 ; Power: 93.02 ; Sched. Rank: 327 (47)

 

193 (16) HUMBOLDT ; Rating:  0.968 ; Power: 94.02 ; Sched. Rank: 262 (9)

 

197 (17) MIDWAY (Kingston) ; Rating:  0.958 ; Power: 96.17 ; Sched. Rank: 284 (20)

 

198 (18) MIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  0.957 ; Power: 91.79 ; Sched. Rank: 317 (37)

 

206 (19) CLOUDLAND (Roan Mountain) ; Rating:  0.930 ; Power: 93.32 ; Sched. Rank: 215 (2)

 

220 (20) KIPP COLLEGIATE (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.889 ; Power: 89.98 ; Sched. Rank: 335 (53)

 

225 (21) WHITWELL ; Rating:  0.863 ; Power: 88.48 ; Sched. Rank: 278 (17)

 

232 (22) SUMMERTOWN ; Rating:  0.841 ; Power: 82.46 ; Sched. Rank: 337 (55)

 

234 (23) McEWEN ; Rating:  0.836 ; Power: 83.65 ; Sched. Rank: 323 (43)

 

246 (24) SOUTH FULTON ; Rating:  0.798 ; Power: 85.18 ; Sched. Rank: 300 (24)

 

248 (25) HOLLOW ROCK-BRUCETON CENTRAL ; Rating:  0.792 ; Power: 79.91 ; Sched. Rank: 308 (30)

 

250 (26) COLLINWOOD ; Rating:  0.780 ; Power: 81.28 ; Sched. Rank: 310 (31)

 

256 (27) JELLICO ; Rating:  0.772 ; Power: 80.24 ; Sched. Rank: 257 (6)

 

259 (28) LAKE COUNTY (Tiptonville) ; Rating:  0.764 ; Power: 82.83 ; Sched. Rank: 303 (25)

 

264 (29) OAKDALE ; Rating:  0.754 ; Power: 78.67 ; Sched. Rank: 333 (51)

 

269 (30) CORNERSVILLE ; Rating:  0.743 ; Power: 83.95 ; Sched. Rank: 314 (34)

 

270 (31) JO BYRNS (Cedar Hill) ; Rating:  0.742 ; Power: 78.31 ; Sched. Rank: 319 (39)

 

272 (32) MEMPHIS MIDDLE COLLEGE ; Rating:  0.733 ; Power: 79.32 ; Sched. Rank: 341 (57)

 

277 (33) HUNTLAND ; Rating:  0.724 ; Power: 80.85 ; Sched. Rank: 330 (50)

 

281 (34) CLARKSVILLE ACADEMY ; Rating:  0.698 ; Power: 78.58 ; Sched. Rank: 277 (16)

 

286 (35) GRACE BAPTIST (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.667 ; Power: 78.83 ; Sched. Rank: 325 (45)

 

294 (36) MONTEREY ; Rating:  0.615 ; Power: 75.38 ; Sched. Rank: 313 (33)

 

300 (37) HANCOCK COUNTY (Sneedville) ; Rating:  0.585 ; Power: 74.32 ; Sched. Rank: 339 (56)

 

305 (38) GRACE CHRISTIAN (Franklin) ; Rating:  0.581 ; Power: 78.80 ; Sched. Rank: 326 (46)

 

307 (39) GREENFIELD ; Rating:  0.573 ; Power: 73.66 ; Sched. Rank: 280 (18)

 

309 (40) MOORE COUNTY (Lynchburg) ; Rating:  0.561 ; Power: 71.78 ; Sched. Rank: 328 (48)

 

314 (41) SUNBRIGHT ; Rating:  0.548 ; Power: 70.42 ; Sched. Rank: 227 (4)

 

315 (42) COPPER BASIN (Copperhill) ; Rating:  0.544 ; Power: 72.37 ; Sched. Rank: 306 (28)

 

319 (43) PERRY COUNTY (Linden) ; Rating:  0.507 ; Power: 68.33 ; Sched. Rank: 275 (15)

 

321 (44) RED BOILING SPRINGS ; Rating:  0.491 ; Power: 66.90 ; Sched. Rank: 320 (40)

 

322 (45) WEST CARROLL (Atwood) ; Rating:  0.476 ; Power: 71.45 ; Sched. Rank: 266 (10)

 

325 (46) MIDDLETON ; Rating:  0.415 ; Power: 60.16 ; Sched. Rank: 305 (27)

 

326 (47) CLAY COUNTY (Celina) ; Rating:  0.408 ; Power: 61.33 ; Sched. Rank: 318 (38)

 

329 (48) BOOKER T. WASHINGTON (Memphis) ; Rating:  0.398 ; Power: 62.58 ; Sched. Rank: 271 (13)

 

330 (49) MT. PLEASANT ; Rating:  0.398 ; Power: 67.86 ; Sched. Rank: 315 (35)

 

332 (50) RICHLAND (Lynnville) ; Rating:  0.350 ; Power: 65.19 ; Sched. Rank: 329 (49)

 

334 (51) HOUSTON COUNTY (Erin) ; Rating:  0.340 ; Power: 63.44 ; Sched. Rank: 304 (26)

 

335 (52) SALE CREEK ; Rating:  0.329 ; Power: 54.83 ; Sched. Rank: 336 (54)

 

336 (53) LOOKOUT VALLEY (Chattanooga) ; Rating:  0.312 ; Power: 59.78 ; Sched. Rank: 307 (29)

 

337 (54) GLEASON ; Rating:  0.275 ; Power: 55.17 ; Sched. Rank: 261 (8)

 

338 (55) UNAKA (Elizabethton) ; Rating:  0.270 ; Power: 53.39 ; Sched. Rank: 321 (41)

 

339 (56) PICKETT COUNTY (Byrdstown) ; Rating:  0.245 ; Power: 53.94 ; Sched. Rank: 322 (42)

 

343 (57) CONCORD CHRISTIAN (Knoxville) ; Rating:  0.152 ; Power: 45.84 ; Sched. Rank: 334 (52)

 

 

Predictions

GREENBACK over SOUTH PITTSBURG by 4.8

 

DRESDEN over WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) by 8.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1A

34 (1) GREENBACK ; Rating:  1.562 ; Power: 118.97 ; Sched. Rank: 224 (3)

 

46 (2) DRESDEN ; Rating:  1.476 ; Power: 118.34 ; Sched. Rank: 311 (32)

 

63 (3) WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) ; Rating:  1.424 ; Power: 109.40 ; Sched. Rank: 297 (23)

 

65 (4) SOUTH PITTSBURG ; Rating:  1.417 ; Power: 114.16 ; Sched. Rank: 282 (19)

 

 

 

Predictions

GREENBACK over SOUTH PITTSBURG by 4.8

 

DRESDEN over WAYNE COUNTY (Waynesboro) by 8.9

 

does your analysis compute home field or is this just a head to head neutral field match up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol

 

I'm thinking his analysis doesn't compute for home field. If so I would like to know how much.

 

Home field in high school has equated to less than half a point on average. Granted some teams do play upwards of 2 to 2.5 points better at home, but some play 2 points worse at home. The average difference the past two seasons in TN has been just under 0.5 points for home field so I don't factor it in for high school.

 

For all of college football (NAIA, D1, D2, and D3) home field home field is typically a little over 2 points and the NFL is traditionally around 3 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the recognition! Much appreciated.

Not a problem. I appreciate what you do for FREE. I enjoy checking every week to see what you've came up with. Your predictions are correct way more times than not. No one could possibly predict everything correct but these guys look to Hammer you every time something is slightly off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home field in high school has equated to less than half a point on average. Granted some teams do play upwards of 2 to 2.5 points better at home, but some play 2 points worse at home. The average difference the past two seasons in TN has been just under 0.5 points for home field so I don't factor it in for high school.

 

For all of college football (NAIA, D1, D2, and D3) home field home field is typically a little over 2 points and the NFL is traditionally around 3 points.

 

Thanks for the detailed response my friend.  I appreciate it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Yeah and the coach is gone. Whole bizarre situation here. We played them a couple of times at MTSU last few years. She was a player for sure. 
    • This whole situation is bonkers. You don’t just kick your star player off the team just because you heard them say the F word; the coach definitely had something against the player, or somebody definitely did. Also, nobody has brought up the idea that the school blackmailed the college to get the college to withdraw the scholarship offer, not to mention that the coach who kicked her off is no longer even with the program; they were fired. I think this is a pretty easy lawsuit. I don’t know if she should deserve that much money, but I think she should get enough money for a full-ride scholarship if she cannot get one after this situation.
    • Oh yeah, I’m sure you are different people just always on the same thread for some reason, always agreeing with each other, perhaps just a bunch of dorks who would like to ###### and moan about high school football coaches do a lot of other students, so you make a football team and get a yell at them. When they do something wrong, but I’m sure you don’t like that, do you?   and I’m sure I’m aware of where you get information. A teacher who was on the coaching staff but was fired after the new coaching and staff came in and realized he actually had to start taking his assistant job a little bit more seriously than just wanting to make a little extra cash on the side, hardly even showing up to most practices, should’ve left with his buddy to go to Farragut. I’m sure he could get him a defensive coaching job, but I doubt he will be there in three years. Looking at the way Farragut is currently going.
    • It may be hard to believe but there’s more people than me that think you guys are a bunch of losers.    I’m sure the coaching staff, yourself included, cursed at a bunch of high school students. Nobody could name more than 3 coaches on staff due to the constant turnover. 
    • That's complete BS.  Nobody at ACHS has access to CHS student records unless a transfer is made from CHS to ACHS.  
×
  • Create New...