I'm willing to bet I'm the only one troubled by this, but I'll state my case anyway. The Chatt. paper reported last week, CSAS "topples" Temple. This week it's similar: "Grace Topples Temple." In order for someone to be toppled, don't they have to be on top? As I see it, Temple has not been in that position this year. Maybe the reporter is just referring to their being first in the state last year. Or maybe I'm too obsessed with semantics. It just bugs me a little that the media is so enamored with anything Temple. Anyone?