usckk Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Dude, seriously...SH doubles is weak. I wouldn't worry too much...But then again. DON"T TAKE THEM TOO LIGHTLY! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nation_supp89 Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Dude, seriously...SH doubles is weak. I wouldn't worry too much...But then again. DON"T TAKE THEM TOO LIGHTLY! We learned our lesson concerning that when we took Bearden too lightly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=Cptn.Crunk=- Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 So does Science Hill play Siegel? If so, I would have to go with Science Hill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cutters Crazies Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 No surprise you picking against Siegel...go with who you want, but I have a feeling you will be disappointed if your going with Science Hill. People have been doubting Wishing all year. He is out to prove that last year was no fluke...in the team and the individual. He will beat Smith and Siegel will move on to the finals...thats my prediction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=Cptn.Crunk=- Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 dude im not bias againist Siegel, Im just picking the right team to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingman10 Posted May 20, 2006 Report Share Posted May 20, 2006 Science Hill over Bearden was an upset. Science Hill will not beat Siegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiec996 Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Seigal>Science Hill unless they stack which science hill is prone too. at the rotary tournament there were some people playing in the lower divisions that i know were in the top 3 on the team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nation_supp89 Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Seigal>Science Hill unless they stack which science hill is prone too. at the rotary tournament there were some people playing in the lower divisions that i know were in the top 3 on the team for example, chris smith was playing number 3....?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiec996 Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 yeah, he played our number 3, colton norton, in the final of the rotary. Dont get me wrong, colton is a great player and played very well but chris was on a completely different level. I sensed stackage when i saw their true lineup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=Cptn.Crunk=- Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 Since Science Hill did not stack againist Bearden, I dont think they will stack againist Siegel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cutters Crazies Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 After post-season starts you can't change your lineup....if their lineup was that way vs. Bearden it will be that vs. Siegel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankiec996 Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 good news for yall then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.