Jump to content

Father Ryan vs. Brentwood Academy


Philippians 4_13
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE(Philippians 4_13 @ Jan 16 2007 - 02:04 PM) 826333899[/snapback]

Father Ryan faces off against Brentwood Academy today. Does Cash drop to 130 and face Marchetti? Does Brentwood Academy have a chance to upset the Irish?

 

 

 

I'd be surprised if at this point, Cash would drop to 130 (that may be the long term goal for State). My guess is that he will wrestle at 140.

 

BA may have a shot, but it would be a long one . . . Ryan looks pretty tough . . . I'd love to see it though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fan6 @ Jan 16 2007 - 02:07 PM) 826333905[/snapback]

I'd be surprised if at this point, Cash would drop to 130 (that may be the long term goal for State). My guess is that he will wrestle at 140.

 

BA may have a shot, but it would be a long one . . . Ryan looks pretty tough . . . I'd love to see it though!

 

 

 

I think it will be a great dual match. I predict Ryan to win by 15-21 over Brentwood Academy. They'll have a better chance of MBA this coming Thursday than Ryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(bigbigguy @ Jan 16 2007 - 09:55 PM) 826334334[/snapback]

father ryan won 40-20. To my surprise Cash wrestled at 145. Why do you think he did this? I figured he at least stay at 140.

 

 

Our 135 is very good (Townes) not good enough to win against Ryan. So, they take the win at 140 with Townes which moves Cash to 145. Our 130 is injured (Tom Wilson). No way to hit Ryan head on and have a prayer. The coach has to gamble. 103 to 112 bring in the 8th grader to try and steal a win at 103 and hope you get lucky. Didn't happen - Ryan has too many good wrestlers for our line up.

 

Two years ago we lost 74-6. I think everyone got pinned except one and the forfeit that gave us our 6 points. So, at least we are getting better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Batts @ Jan 16 2007 - 10:43 PM) 826334486[/snapback]

Our 135 is very good (Townes) not good enough to win against Ryan. So, they take the win at 140 with Townes which moves Cash to 145. Our 130 is injured (Tom Wilson). No way to hit Ryan head on and have a prayer. The coach has to gamble. 103 to 112 bring in the 8th grader to try and steal a win at 103 and hope you get lucky. Didn't happen - Ryan has too many good wrestlers for our line up.

 

Two years ago we lost 74-6. I think everyone got pinned except one and the forfeit that gave us our 6 points. So, at least we are getting better.

 

 

 

How did Beki and Brooks do? I would have liked to see him wrestle Brannon at 103 (to get that win) and let Burgin take his lumps at 112 (and try to hold it to a 3 vs a 6). Ah well -- Monday morning QB is easy eh? We have gotten a whole lot better in a pretty short time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(fan6 @ Jan 16 2007 - 10:58 PM) 826334521[/snapback]

How did Beki and Brooks do? I would have liked to see him wrestle Brannon at 103 (to get that win) and let Burgin take his lumps at 112 (and try to hold it to a 3 vs a 6). Ah well -- Monday morning QB is easy eh? We have gotten a whole lot better in a pretty short time.

 

 

Beki won a close decision and Brooks lost a close decision.

 

It just wasn't our day. Calloway came out tentative and nervouse in his high school debut at 103. He came back strong at the end and lost 8-6. I think he would have a good shot at winning if he wrestled that match again. I thought Brannon would and could beat the Ryan 112, but the 112 just said "no". He over powered Brannon and just took the win. I think it would have gone the way you thought. I don't think Burgin would have been pinned. It was a calculated risk that would have turned out not to make a difference, but a good decision to try in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Brian Peppers @ Jan 18 2007 - 07:33 AM) 826335977[/snapback]

BA didn't stand a chance, surely you didnt think the match would have been 'close'.

 

Wasnt your day?b.s.

 

 

 

 

True. BA didn't stand a chance against Ryan. However, several of the matches where Ryan came out on top were close and could have gone either way. Overall Ryan is still the stronger of the two teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Brian Peppers @ Jan 18 2007 - 07:33 AM) 826335977[/snapback]

BA didn't stand a chance, surely you didnt think the match would have been 'close'.

 

Wasnt your day?b.s.

 

 

 

Ah, love the arrogance. Nope, never had a chance . . . I mean who does against the mighty FR? I'm surprised BA even dared to show themselves on the mats. Waste of everyone's time . . .

 

Long Live the Wrestling Kings!

 

QUOTE(heartbreakkid @ Jan 18 2007 - 01:58 PM) 826336603[/snapback]

Can somebody from Brentwood Academy help me out. Why did the Academy forfeit to Marchetti and Bateman? Did they not have wrestlers in those weights?

 

 

 

What weight classes are Marchetti and Bateman in? BA has some injuries (although I'm not sure why C. Cash wouldn't have put out JV guys for the experience)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • A little confused.  What charter/prep schools made it to state in Baseball?  
    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
×
  • Create New...