AirForceOne Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Don't count Hunters Lane out yet! The Hunters Lane coaching staff did EVERYTHING by the book when this kid was rostered. You will see! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hvillefootball Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Don't count Hunters Lane out yet! The Hunters Lane coaching staff did EVERYTHING by the book when this kid was rostered. You will see! Have they officially forfeited their games or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightman Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Don't count Hunters Lane out yet! The Hunters Lane coaching staff did EVERYTHING by the book when this kid was rostered. You will see! What is going on with this situation? are they forfeiting or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRnFSnum5beech Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 What is going on with this situation? are they forfeiting or not? ok, so i called up some friends that play for HL and they explained that this dude named teo that used to play for glencliff but now plays for HL is in his 5th year of highschool.. and glencliffs coach told coach cambell(HL's coach) that he had TO on his team 5 years ago(TO's freshman year) and had pictures to prove it... so coach cambell asked teo after the game how many years of highschool have u had, he said this was his 5th year... so they had an ineligible player, and they have to forfiet every game they have played so far.. and they're new record is now 0-9... this is the truth, so everyone can stop guessing .. T.O is the kids name.. thats what we call him, his real name is antonio.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hvillefootball Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 ok, so i called up some friends that play for HL and they explained that this dude named teo that used to play for glencliff but now plays for HL is in his 5th year of highschool.. and glencliffs coach told coach cambell(HL's coach) that he had TO on his team 5 years ago(TO's freshman year) and had pictures to prove it... so coach cambell asked teo after the game how many years of highschool have u had, he said this was his 5th year... so they had an ineligible player, and they have to forfiet every game they have played so far.. and they're new record is now 0-9... this is the truth, so everyone can stop guessing .. T.O is the kids name.. thats what we call him, his real name is antonio.. I understand that, but AirForceOne made it seem as though there is still a possibility that they wouldn't have to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightman Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Don't count Hunters Lane out yet! The Hunters Lane coaching staff did EVERYTHING by the book when this kid was rostered. You will see! So what exactly is this guy talking about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingtlover Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 i think this guy just wants to have everybody on here guessing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedVenom15 Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 So what exactly is this guy talking about? AirForce1 is thinking that just because the Hunters Lane coaching staff did everything by the book that everything will be okay. Unfortunately in 2003, Gallatin did everything by the book and the ineligible player slipped through the cracks. The same thing happened with Hunters Lane kid. All games that he participated in will be forfeited, which to my understanding has been the previous nine games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volfan Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 So what exactly is this guy talking about? Why does everyone count McGavock out if everyone will look at the score of the HL McGavock game it was 7-6 and McGavock was without 2 of their key offensive players. Did HL have a bad night or is McGavock better than everyone gives them credit. Also McGavock only lost to HVille by 8 which the outcome might have been different if Hville hadn't been given a touchdown that they really didn't get. McGavock has been without their starting quarterback since week 4 so don't count them out anything can happen against Gallatin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hvillefootball Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Why does everyone count McGavock out if everyone will look at the score of the HL McGavock game it was 7-6 and McGavock was without 2 of their key offensive players. Did HL have a bad night or is McGavock better than everyone gives them credit. Also McGavock only lost to HVille by 8 which the outcome might have been different if Hville hadn't been given a touchdown that they really didn't get. McGavock has been without their starting quarterback since week 4 so don't count them out anything can happen against Gallatin. I don't think anyone on here is doubting McGavock, I actually think they have a good chance at beating Gallatin. And by the way, it was a touchdown, get over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HvilleLegend Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 im definately not doubting them against Gallatin i think they are better to be honest with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightman Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Noone is doubting McGavock i was attending that game and it was most definitely a touchdown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.