Jump to content

Oakland vs. Brentwood Academy


randymc
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just got in from this controlled practice. Seemed like they ran 3 plays from 1st and 10, 3 plays from 2nd and 7 and 3 plays from 3rd and 2 then switched. It looked to me like the strength of this team is up front, both on offense and defense along with the running backs. Both teams hit a couple of big plays, BA had a long pass for a TD after the OHS DB jumped too soon (should have been int) and OHS had a kick off return for a TD, there was a flag in the middle of the field after the play, not sure which team it was on, but it was away from the play and totally unnecessary for either team. BA also had a long TD on a sweep late in the scrimmage against some of the OHS reserves. The O-line gave the Adams time to pass the ball the times they attempted to pass, but it looks like the RBs will be a huge part of the offense again this year. BA looked good too and had more big plays than OHS, but I think OHS would have moved the ball well on them had it been a real scrimmage or game. BA couldn't get much going inside against the OHS D-line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They had 10 play sets. 5, 1st and 10's. 3, 3rd and 8. and 2, 3rd and 2. Each team had 4 sets of those so a total of 40 offensive plays for each team. Then a Kicking Scrimmage with punt teams, kick teams, etc..

 

Score was 20-3, counting PAT and Field Goals from the Kicking Scrimmage. Oaklands long kickoff return was called back for block in the back. But as far as just offensive went, it was 14-0 BA won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had 10 play sets. 5, 1st and 10's. 3, 3rd and 8. and 2, 3rd and 2. Each team had 4 sets of those so a total of 40 offensive plays for each team. Then a Kicking Scrimmage with punt teams, kick teams, etc..

 

Score was 20-3, counting PAT and Field Goals from the Kicking Scrimmage. Oaklands long kickoff return was called back for block in the back. But as far as just offensive went, it was 14-0 BA won.

 

This is WAY too deceiving, because OHS would have driven the ball on BA all night. The only scores he's counting are the big plays. Couldn't estimate a score really. And nobody knows if the penalty on the kickoff was against OHS or BA. OHS would have picked up 1st down after 1st down that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I was stating was that you can't just count BA's scores and say it was 14-0 when OHS was definitely able to move the ball on BA. And I know on the last TD OHS had several defensive starters not on the field, whether the coaches called for 1st team or not at the beginning of the series. I do know people were not happy at all with the format of the scrimmage and think that it was chosen for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I was stating was that you can't just count BA's scores and say it was 14-0 when OHS was definitely able to move the ball on BA. And I know on the last TD OHS had several defensive starters not on the field, whether the coaches called for 1st team or not at the beginning of the series. I do know people were not happy at all with the format of the scrimmage and think that it was chosen for a reason.

 

Agreed. People get so caught up with score, that they fail to see the improvement that their team makes on the field should they lose, it was a good experience for Oakland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the format had nothing to do with it that is genarally how you play early scrimages,real issue here is not understanding the game of football enough to make comments like oakland running all over somebody both teams looked good,but ba had a little more fire power on o that is what I was saying. It goes with out saying tim mcadoo caused ba some problems but ba had fire power to still put points on the board through big plays in football you still give him six.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the format had nothing to do with it that is genarally how you play early scrimages,real issue here is not understanding the game of football enough to make comments like oakland running all over somebody both teams looked good,but ba had a little more fire power on o that is what I was saying. It goes with out saying tim mcadoo caused ba some problems but ba had fire power to still put points on the board through big plays in football you still give him six.

 

I can vouch for randymc, he knows football and Oakland had their fair share of success moving the football. In a actual game enviroment, who knows what the outcome would have been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...