Jump to content

8th graders elgibility


soccernut151
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Here's what I think it is. 8th graders can play on the varsity if the middle school is "on the same campus" as the high school. But once the 8th grader plays, he or she is subject to the same transfer rules as 9-12th graders. That is, if the player plays in 8th grade at one school, then transfers to another school, the player must wait 365 days from the last day played at the old school before playing at the new school.

 

Have you looked at the TSSAA web site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me if a player opts to play varsity in 8th grade, they are taking one of their 4 years of eligibility and should not be able to play in their senior year. Why should we penalize all of those other players and give only a select few players an extra year of competition/experience. I was turned down eligibility to play varsity for that reason many (many) years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is an eligibility rule, as in 4 years only. I think it comes from baseball and football where good athletic have gotten to play more because of necessity that greatness. I think, as regards to soccer, if there was a 4 year rule, you would never see an 8th grader.

If my daughter/son is at a school with middle and high schools at the same location and your son/daughter is at Tiger Woods Middle on Main Street and the Tiger Woods High School is on Second Street, how do you make that the determining factor????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite simple. Achieving Freshman status (9th grade), you are now eligible to participate in organized High School Athletics. You are at an age considered physically strong enough and mentally tough enough to deal with 18 & 19 year-olds on a field of competitive play. In order to compete with other programs, you would need to demonstrate to your coach that your talent (plus physique and mental capabilities) exceeds that of other upperclassman from your own program and it would be in his opinion and that of your parents that you can compete. That behind you, when you are runover by someone who is 5-6 years older than you and and twice your physical size that you consider it all a part of the game and not to look at the ref for the sympathy that bigger mean girls shouldn't be permitted to do that to a girl half their size. I think in club ball that may be why they group all the soccer players by age such that these events don't normally take place, but only by some freak of nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well said. And yes, that is one reason select is a different creature. I brought up this 8th grader only because we were needing another player and I worked with her in ODP this summer, know her former club coach well, and realized she had the athleticism and ability to help our varsity team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is an eligibility rule, as in 4 years only. I think it comes from baseball and football where good athletic have gotten to play more because of necessity that greatness. I think, as regards to soccer, if there was a 4 year rule, you would never see an 8th grader.

If my daughter/son is at a school with middle and high schools at the same location and your son/daughter is at Tiger Woods Middle on Main Street and the Tiger Woods High School is on Second Street, how do you make that the determining factor????

 

There 4 year rule says that you have 4 years of eligibility once you begin HS. As mentioned above, as long as the HS is on the same campus as the MS, an 8th grader can play (Section 8 of the bylaws). I would venture to say that the thought behind it the MS and HS having to be on the same campus has something to with avoiding recruiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just doesn't seem fair to me. Either they should be allowed to play in 8th grade for the school district they are in or they shouldn't be allowed to play. Makes absolutely no sense that because they are on one campus it is ok. I have been around quite a few 8th graders that could have played on high school teams. Not to take away from those that have the ability and are doing it but it still doesn't seem fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I have made use of this rule on my squad, I do wonder the reasoning behind putting it in place to begin with.

 

Was it a "numbers" issue?

 

Was it a "talent" issue?

 

I know the rule has been in effect for 8 years (don't know before that), but does anyone know when it originated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rationale for the "campus" rule might be as simple as making it safe and convenient for the 8th grader. If the player has to somehow get from a school a couple of miles away, it becomes a time and safety issue.

 

I agree that it still seems a little strange and perhaps unfair that you can only play if you are "on campus".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
    • An FYI: To see how an opponent has done against another opponent since 2001- go to the game by clicking on one of the teams. Click the G beside the game. For example, Milan: The info will show you the previous matchups and other info.
    • All these college signees went yo other schools for 3 years, were getting college offers then transferred to Bearden. It’s not like this staff did much to develop them.    The BBall coaches son and the Seymour transfer were some of the most talented QBs in the region, and you guys developed them into QBs who might complete one pass a game. 
×
  • Create New...