Jump to content

Dragons vs. Mustangs


cleansheet1
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes....here we ALL go again! Let's spice up the Friday!

 

We were merely responding to a post to get clarification. The questions were not directed at you nor do the comments have anything to do with club soccer! We are trying to stay away from that subject as the "G man" will get involved. :twisted:

 

Do you have a comment on the thread at hand or just a question for the dog and me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, every dog has his day... even those who like to go swim. :shock: (yes, thank the Lord that it is Friday!)

 

Sadly enough, a little spice on the boards is kind of welcome these days (gasp!). Let's just not let it get out of hand, or I'll have to "let the dogs out"!

 

:twisted: (Decided to grow a little facial hair on the uber-geek)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ponyclub's question? Sorry you lost me there...

 

You're right. Germantown's strength is its defense. If they score, it will not be a lot. But they did manage to outscore Collierville. :thumb:

 

Houston scored a lot of goals vs. Collierville, but allowed almost as many. I'm just saying, it should be interesting to see a strong defensive team play a strong offensive team. Good luck to both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ponyclub's question? Sorry you lost me there...

 

You're right. Germantown's strength is its defense. If they score, it will not be a lot. But they did manage to outscore Collierville. :thumb:

 

 

As we all know...a final score is not necessarily reflective of the actual play by each team. I would definitely bet that Collierville had more possession and more shots on goal than Germantown did...funny sport...the right set pieces make all the difference!

 

If all stats were posted for high school soccer like in a college box score, we could all have better insight to how a game was played as the score certainly does not tell the story. I agree that Germantown has one of the best defenses in the city...but to Canes point....playing 8 girls defensively does not allow for a lot of wins...

 

Question is...should a team play for the win or play to not lose? I vote for playing for the win! :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smom-

 

As always with you, you speak before the final whistle blows.

 

Excuse me? When did I speak before the final whistle blows?

 

If you follow the thread (and note dates and times), early in the week...predictions were given....then I provided a half time update and then a final score update for this game...you may want to read the thread more carefully before throwing any insults.

 

And mstreep....the reference to the ponyclub question is due to the above....still not sure where I spoke before the whistle was blown...which started much of the string and Friday spice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ponyclub's question? Sorry you lost me there...It had to do with the question you answered"here they go again"

 

You're right. Germantown's strength is its defense. If they score, it will not be a lot. But they did manage to outscore Collierville. :huh:Trying to mess with Canes on CHS is not a good idea!!

 

 

Houston scored a lot of goals vs. Collierville, but allowed almost as many. I'm just saying, it should be interesting to see a strong defensive team play a strong offensive team. Good luck to both.

I think, just a thought now, Houston is a stronger offensive team than Germantown is a defender, maybe not 4 goals better, but two or more.

 

 

Sooooooo......

Let's predict again:

Houston 3

Germantown .5

 

Houston did not score 4 on St. Agnes and St. Agnes did not score 4 on Houston, but both could and sort of did, more so for Houston.

Not sure why we do this, but it's raining and not much happening on T any more. I might need to find someone to bait on the b'ball thread. :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we all know...a final score is not necessarily reflective of the actual play by each team. I would definitely bet that Collierville had more possession and more shots on goal than Germantown did...funny sport...the right set pieces make all the difference!

 

If all stats were posted for high school soccer like in a college box score, we could all have better insight to how a game was played as the score certainly does not tell the story. I agree that Germantown has one of the best defenses in the city...but to Canes point....playing 8 girls defensively does not allow for a lot of wins...

 

Question is...should a team play for the win or play to not lose? I vote for playing for the win! :huh:

 

Wait...Collierville does keep and post stats!

 

Collierville shots - 19

Collierville shots on goal - 11 (G'town keeper did an amazing job) :huh:

Collierville Saves - 1 (guess G'town had 3 total shots on goal for the game)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Recent Posts

    • Yeah.  Kids only transfer in and out of Bearden these days, you know.   That particular poster evidentially has a personal vendetta with Josh Jones.   Consider the source.  And the kid transferring to McCallie is a terrific talent, but an opportunity to go to McCallie on scholarship (and I am assuming that is the case) is one that is very much beneficial both athletically and academically.  McCallie is a great school for both.   Bearden will be fine.  And so will both of those kids who decided with their parents/advisors to go elsewhere.  
    • I think we are conducting interviews now since we have so many wanting to come to school here and play for a real team with a chance to play in front of lot's of fan's and have a chance to win a championship every year.  
    • Esteemed colleagues, On this auspicious Saturday morning, I fortuitously encountered Dr. Satterfield at the Early Bird Cafe, whereupon we engaged in a discourse concerning the pool of candidates vying for a coveted position. Dr. Satterfield, possessing a discerning eye, has graciously shared insights into the contenders, which I shall now relay to you in a structured manner. Eric Vetetoe, though initially absent from my considerations, ascended to the zenith of Clint's roster, poised atop his discerning clipboard as a preeminent candidate. Kyle Gregory, with a coaching demeanor reminiscent of a bygone era, has captivated Clint's admiration. His interview performance, I am informed, left an indelible impression, aligning seamlessly with Clint's nostalgic sentiments. Davy Cothron's cerebral approach to offense, notwithstanding a past championship game setback, garners high praise from Dr. Satterfield. His strategic acumen, it appears, remains unblemished despite previous trials. Brandon Eden's steadfast allegiance to the team, evidenced by his tenure on the creekbank, earns him considerable favor in Clint's estimation. Anticipation lingers as to whether an offer may be extended in recognition of his unwavering dedication. Wesley Satterfield emerges as a compelling candidate following a favorable assessment by Mr. Satterfield himself. The prospect of a Satterfield succession holds a certain allure, embodying continuity and tradition in equal measure. Kyle Shoulders, a surprising entrant in the applicant pool, impresses Clint with his football intellect, potentially positioning him as a contender for the role. Josh Hackett's defensive prowess, particularly in encounters against Trousdale over recent years, earns commendation from Coach Satterfield, underscoring his proficiency in the strategic aspects of the game. John McNeal's track record of success across multiple sports affords him undeniable merit, though the prospect of his acceptance, if offered, remains uncertain. Chad Evitts, a former NFL luminary, presents a unique opportunity, recognized keenly by Mr. Satterfield, to infuse our program with elite expertise and experience. Matt Dyer, revered for his contributions during the regular season, faces scrutiny for his playoff performances, a dichotomy that weighs upon Clint's evaluation. Chuck Gentry, endorsed by Dr. Satterfield, embodies the promise of transformative leadership, drawing parallels to his past triumphs in revitalizing programs akin to ours. Clint extols BJ West's astute management at the middle school echelon, where his strategic maneuver of strategically calibrating the team's schedule to optimize performance stands as a testament to his sagacity and acumen in navigating competitive dynamics. In conclusion, the deliberations surrounding our prospective leadership remain nuanced and multifaceted, underscoring the significance of this decision in shaping the future trajectory of our esteemed institution.  
    • Unfortunately we did after the first hire, that's why we tried to fight it so bad. this is a bad situation for our community and school.
×
  • Create New...