Jump to content

Privates in Other States


Solomon
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wasn't sure where to put this and decided to put it here.

 

I didn't get to see Moeller play but I did watch a godo bit of St. X/Good Counsel on Sunday and I wasn't impressed with either.

 

I know some of you follow the big privates from other states a lot more closely than I do and wondered if you could update me on who is their typical selves and who may be down this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solly,

I remember seeing my first Titans game. They played Jacksonville, and Vanderbilt was their home stadium. Now, I had seen NFL games in person before, but as a runt, and in bleacher seats. At Vanderbilt, all of the seats are close to the field, and especially the ones in the first few rows. Long story short, to this day, I thought the common observation by rookies about “the speed of the game†was hogwash before that game. I never doubted it again after that game.

 

I saw the games on TV this weekend, too, including Hoover-Byrnes. I, too, agree that what was seen on TV didn’t blow me away either, public or private. But, while you have to apply the parallel above much more loosely (i.e., the difference from college to NFL is far more pronounced than TV HS football to live HS football), TV does not do justice. Factor in whatever awe there is of playing a “name†opponent, the thought of being on national TV, etc., and it is a different setting than the neighborhood rivalry – probably not for the whole game, but initially, yes.

 

I don’t know how KW felt when he saw Moeller two years ago, but I know how I felt. MBA looked to be set up for another blowout by an out-of-state biggie. Those blue jerseys, yellow pants, the roster, the routines and precision in which pregame drills were run, being in an NFL stadium – maybe it was the newness of it, but it was pretty impressive. Trinity (KY) looked pretty good in warm-ups in 2003 in Nashville, but Moeller was far more impressive. But, admittedly, once the game started, the butterflies stopped, I’m sure. A perfectly executed hook-and-ladder does wonders as well.

 

To your question, who the powers are this year, I am not sure. In OH, common thinking is that St. X is down this year and Moeller may have a good year. I know Trinity plays St. X (KY and OH) this year and should be good. As for other privates in the South, the ones from MS and AL aren’t much to talk about. GA has some decent programs in Atlanta, but they are usually a bit behind the ones is TN (I’ll let you know – I am actually attending a Westminster game in October; they are not an upper echelon football private – but academically, yes). And of course, there is a private out in Concord, CA, that has won a game or two and put together a streak that rivaled Maryville’s and South Panola’s – combined.

 

Probably didn’t answer your question exactly, but I’ll leave you with two thoughts:

 

1. The easiest schools to beat are the ones that don’t have to be played.

 

2. There is a decent amount of footage on the internet of MUS-South Panola from last year. By looks alone, that game is a huge mismatch – SP was bigger, stronger, faster. But watch what those little MUS boys did to them. I must say that I was utterly impressed - and literally watched it again, not believing what I saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solly,

I remember seeing my first Titans game. They played Jacksonville, and Vanderbilt was their home stadium. Now, I had seen NFL games in person before, but as a runt, and in bleacher seats. At Vanderbilt, all of the seats are close to the field, and especially the ones in the first few rows. Long story short, to this day, I thought the common observation by rookies about “the speed of the game†was hogwash before that game. I never doubted it again after that game.

 

I saw the games on TV this weekend, too, including Hoover-Byrnes. I, too, agree that what was seen on TV didn’t blow me away either, public or private. But, while you have to apply the parallel above much more loosely (i.e., the difference from college to NFL is far more pronounced than TV HS football to live HS football), TV does not do justice. Factor in whatever awe there is of playing a “name†opponent, the thought of being on national TV, etc., and it is a different setting than the neighborhood rivalry – probably not for the whole game, but initially, yes.

 

I don’t know how KW felt when he saw Moeller two years ago, but I know how I felt. MBA looked to be set up for another blowout by an out-of-state biggie. Those blue jerseys, yellow pants, the roster, the routines and precision in which pregame drills were run, being in an NFL stadium – maybe it was the newness of it, but it was pretty impressive. Trinity (KY) looked pretty good in warm-ups in 2003 in Nashville, but Moeller was far more impressive. But, admittedly, once the game started, the butterflies stopped, I’m sure. A perfectly executed hook-and-ladder does wonders as well.

 

To your question, who the powers are this year, I am not sure. In OH, common thinking is that St. X is down this year and Moeller may have a good year. I know Trinity plays St. X (KY and OH) this year and should be good. As for other privates in the South, the ones from MS and AL aren’t much to talk about. GA has some decent programs in Atlanta, but they are usually a bit behind the ones is TN (I’ll let you know – I am actually attending a Westminster game in October; they are not an upper echelon football private – but academically, yes). And of course, there is a private out in Concord, CA, that has won a game or two and put together a streak that rivaled Maryville’s and South Panola’s – combined.

 

Probably didn’t answer your question exactly, but I’ll leave you with two thoughts:

 

1. The easiest schools to beat are the ones that don’t have to be played.

 

2. There is a decent amount of footage on the internet of MUS-South Panola from last year. By looks alone, that game is a huge mismatch – SP was bigger, stronger, faster. But watch what those little MUS boys did to them. I must say that I was utterly impressed - and literally watched it again, not believing what I saw.

 

Truthfully, I was expecting Hoover and Byrnes to score a lot of point too and was shocked by that one. I didn't get to see any of the Texas teams play due to family matters.

 

I was just curious. I've not kept up as much with high school ball the past couple of seasons as in years past. I would like to see MUS/SP though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't sure where to put this and decided to put it here.

 

I didn't get to see Moeller play but I did watch a godo bit of St. X/Good Counsel on Sunday and I wasn't impressed with either.

 

I know some of you follow the big privates from other states a lot more closely than I do and wondered if you could update me on who is their typical selves and who may be down this year.

 

In Ohio, St. X will be down early, and improve as the season goes on, but nothing like their MNC year of '07. Lost a lot, with new qb(1st varsity game/4interceptions)entire secondary, and recievers. Watching the game, I saw they start 3 or 4 sophmores, which doesn't happen at X, with 340 players and two freshman squads of 60. Their schedule doesn't help, as Specht schedules harder than anyone in the country year in/year out. Six of X's opponents have won a big school title in the last 3 yrs. Played 5 returning state champs in '07, 4 last year. I see them losing 3 or 4 games and making the playoffs as a lower seed if they are lucky. Moeller will be solid, but lack overall team speed, and that will be their downfall come playoff time. With that enormus line and big backs, they will win most games. Right now, the best private in Ohio regardless of division might be DivIII Youngstown Mooney who beat a DivI playoff team by 20 last week....

Mooney

They can and do play with anybody, including other states' powers. They play an incredible schedule every year, because they have a tough time finding teams their size that will play them. Another team looking to have a great year is Mentor Lake Catholic, behind an offensive line that averages 6'4" 305 lbs and can move.

Edited by jlmac4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...