Jump to content

Region 1 Duals


ArtusCimber
 Share

Recommended Posts

The match with Jefferson Co. did not include several varisty matches that would have took place in a normal dual match. There was many JV kids thrown in and some forfeits which made the score not realistic. Both teams had a few kids banged up from previous matches and rested in spots when possible.

 

103 Hudgins (Hill) over Molinar (Jeff) Fall 2:42

112 Sutherland (Hill) over Wilmouth (Jeff) Fall 1:27

119 M.Vaughn (Hill) over Shannon (Jeff) Fall 1:59

125 Bagley (Hill) over Jones (Jeff) Fall 4:44

130 Schurlknight (Hill) over Posey (Jeff) Fall :43

135 Damman (Hill) over Evon (Jeff) Dec 17-15

140 Vaughan (Hill)over Greer (Jeff) Fall 1:29

145 Stroud (Hill) over Webb (Jeff) Fall :40

152 Riley (Hill) over Churchman (Jeff) Fall 4:42

160 Johnson (Jeff) over Fullbright (Hill) Dec 10-6

171 Bradley (Jeff) Forfeit

189 Lowery (Hill) over Carter (Jeff) Fall 1:32

215 Lyon (Hill) Forfeit

285 Brittain (Hill) Forfeit

 

Hill 69

Jeff 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The match with Jefferson Co. did not include several varisty matches that would have took place in a normal dual match. There was many JV kids thrown in and some forfeits which made the score not realistic. Both teams had a few kids banged up from previous matches and rested in spots when possible.

 

103 Hudgins (Hill) over Molinar (Jeff) Fall 2:42

112 Sutherland (Hill) over Wilmouth (Jeff) Fall 1:27

119 M.Vaughn (Hill) over Shannon (Jeff) Fall 1:59

125 Bagley (Hill) over Jones (Jeff) Fall 4:44

130 Schurlknight (Hill) over Posey (Jeff) Fall :43

135 Damman (Hill) over Evon (Jeff) Dec 17-15

140 Vaughan (Hill)over Greer (Jeff) Fall 1:29

145 Stroud (Hill) over Webb (Jeff) Fall :40

152 Riley (Hill) over Churchman (Jeff) Fall 4:42

160 Johnson (Jeff) over Fullbright (Hill) Dec 10-6

171 Bradley (Jeff) Forfeit

189 Lowery (Hill) over Carter (Jeff) Fall 1:32

215 Lyon (Hill) Forfeit

285 Brittain (Hill) Forfeit

 

Hill 69

Jeff 9

 

I think what matcat is trying to say in a nice/respectful way was this..............if SH and JC lined up in a normal dual match, and each team wrestled their starters, the final score would be SH 78 JC 3 (without a doubt). It could possibly be 81-0 (because Fulbright for SH at 160 gave the JC kid a tough match).

 

You can sugar coat this all you want, but there is no one in region 1 even close to SH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what matcat is trying to say in a nice/respectful way was this..............if SH and JC lined up in a normal dual match, and each team wrestled their starters, the final score would be SH 78 JC 3 (without a doubt). It could possibly be 81-0 (because Fulbright for SH at 160 gave the JC kid a tough match).

 

You can sugar coat this all you want, but there is no one in region 1 even close to SH.

Now I would bet it would not be a 81-0. May still be a blow out score but not to the predictions that you have projected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I would bet it would not be a 81-0. May still be a blow out score but not to the predictions that you have projected.

 

It really doesn't matter at this point. I know I'll be a big Jeff County fan down at the state duals. I've always been proud of how the Region 1 teams support each other at the state duals and individual championships. SH and JC should represent well. I thought JC had a good group of young men who represent a great sport in the proper manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

×
  • Create New...