Jump to content

3A Playoffs Right Now


Gerry Bertier
 Share

Recommended Posts

I got an idea, let's put zero importance on district games. Good idea coach!

 

I am assuming your being sarcastic, but will answer you post staight up.

 

I am fine with giving the District champ an automatic bid and seeding priority. However, I have a big problem giving the runner up an automatic bid and seeding priority. The current system is heavily slanted against big districts and districts with lots of good teams in them.

 

Why should 40% of a district get automatic bids and seeding priority over a district that only gets less than 20% automatic bids and seeding priority.

 

Throw the runner-up in with the wild cards and then seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I am assuming your being sarcastic, but will answer you post staight up.

 

I am fine with giving the District champ an automatic bid and seeding priority. However, I have a big problem giving the runner up an automatic bid and seeding priority. The current system is heavily slanted against big districts and districts with lots of good teams in them.

 

Why should 40% of a district get automatic bids and seeding priority over a district that only gets less than 20% automatic bids and seeding priority.

 

Throw the runner-up in with the wild cards and then seed.

 

Yes, I was being sarcastic. But I hope I portrayed how foolish I thought that it sounded that district champions and runner ups not get seeded as a priority.

 

Your real problem is with the zoning of the districts so not sure what that has to do with the champs and runner ups. But speaking on your concern, I'm pretty sure the reason for having a lot in one district and much less in another is due to proximity and keeping rivalries in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Dyersburg is going to be good, really good. As mentioned, they have a lot of talent on the way and the trio of Chelby, Joya, and KayKay will only be better with a full season together under their belt. To me, playing in Murfreesboro two consecutive postseasons will only serve to make them more dangerous if/when they stand among the final eight teams this March. Experience, good or bad, always makes you better. And not only do they have experience, they know how to win there. Schedules are coming together for all of the teams and I am excited about what I am seeing on the preliminary drafts on Dyersburg’s schedule. I know I am being a tease, but it’s simply not my place to announce what another school is doing. With that said, I won’t go into specifics. However, I am excited about renewed home and away contracts for the non-district portion of the calendar. I think west Tennessee will have a lot of interest as well.
    • What does everyone have in the final 8? In no particular order. 1. Eagleville 2. Gordonsville 3. Greenback 4. Oakdale 5. South Pitt/ East Robertson-- not sure 6. Richland 7. Halls 8. Union City
    • They struggled to field a team last year. I don’t see them being much better?
    • sx good two know thay didun't waint that entarr citty two see yeller/red......
    • Couldn’t agree more.. Tate is a special kinda player , but fortunately for us we get a best of 3 series. I think our pitching is better than last year when we made the trip to west tn. Should be a fun 2 or 3 games.
×
  • Create New...