Jump to content

This reminds me of Kingston/Alcoa


hooters
 Share

Recommended Posts

football is becoming too rough with all the thug type action weekly....need to rein em in and teach players disciplne ,respect for others to be used all their lives...look at the smug smile coming off field, that isnt right ..suppose it excites bama coaches too..its dangerous out there as in all places we dare to go...its got to stop at all levels of football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alabama coach Nick Saban was none too pleased with freshman LaMichael Fanning’s body slam tackle of Missouri running back Russell Hansbrough Saturday.

In what more closely resembled a suplex wrestling move, Fanning launched Hansbrough to the ground in a dangerous move that fortunately did not result in serious injury. Fanning, who is 6-7 and 298 pounds, received a personal foul penalty, but his discipline didn’t stop there.

According to the Montgomery Advertiser, Saban called Missouri coach Gary Pinkel to apologize. Additionally, Saban made Fanning write letters of apology to Hansbrough and Pinkel. The Columbia (Mo.) Daily Tribune reported that Pinkel said he received the apology from Saban and the email from Fanning.

Saban said that Fanning would face internal discipline as well.

“I think this is a young player who’s excited about getting into the game, makes very, very poor judgment on making that play,†Saban told the Advertiser. “It’s something that we don’t condone here. It’s not how we want our players to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is football always a "perfect form tackle" type of game? No! That's what I would tell Saban, the reporter, the refs, and anyone else. Did Butkus always tackle with "clean form"? What about Lambert? Do offensive linemen always block with "clean form"? If so then there should never be another cut block (not a "high/low chop block" but a simple 1-on-1 cut block) allowed again? That would eliminate the entire blocking schemes for teams like Navy who have smaller offensive linemen and cut bigger defensive lines. A player could have a "freak" injury if he gets cut and his knee is blown out.

 

As soon as someone takes it to an ultimate extreme and disallows all fouls that could possible injure a player (ie "cut blocks") then I will admit that sometimes tackles are violent.

 

Until then I will coninue to say "not every tackle is a perfectly clean tackle with textbook form" and players only have 1 job which is to get the ball carrier on the ground.

 

If that sounds "too rough" for your child then allow him to become a male cheerleader or join the band. I would say "play baseball" but sometimes even baseball players throw at one another. What if someone is accidentally beamed "just right" and loses vision for life? Does that make the pitcher a criminal? Remember we're talking about high school aged kids (not Greg Maddux or Roger Clemens).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Deja vu all over again, 7 yrs apart. SMDH Does anybody talk to each other?
    • OK, well, that’s because two quarterbacks can’t start. That’s football 101. The main quarterback won the starting job, so he was on varsity, and the Seymour transfer did not win the starting job. He played some varsity. He was mainly junior varsity, and he balled out when healthy, so for the starting quarterback who’s been starting varsity since his freshman year, if you have any form of proof that he’s gotten worse, somehow, whether that means stats or whatnot, please feel free to share.
    • They’ve both gotten worse. I’ve seen enough games to know that. 
    • The only two transfers that Bearden has gotten that went on to play college football were a defensive back from Karnes, who transferred here way before the new coaching staff got here, and a running back from Carter, who went on to play at Maryville College. Both players received those offers while at Bearden, and both players got a diploma from Bearden High School. Therefore, they are Bearden kids, and you can’t do anything about that.   The transfer from Seymour didn’t win the job, what do you expect two quarterbacks to start at the same time? He played great on JV when he could stay healthy, and when he came in on varsity, he did great. The quarterback position is definitely going to be in good hands when the current starting quarterback leaves, but until then, they’re just going to be battling it out like every good quarterback competition does. The current starting quarterback has his flaws, and that is in the pass game, but what he doesn’t have flaws is running and scrambling, and if you go back and watch any game, which I’m sure you didn’t watch any, we used him very often, and when we needed a deep ball, we brought in the transfer from Seymour. The starting quarterback last year will be a senior this year, and the Seymour transfer will be a junior, so the Seymour transfer is definitely going to get his spotlight. He may even win the job this year. Football isn’t about who the newspaper thinks is the best kid. The best kid in the position will win the starting job, and I trust the coaching staff more than a newspaper or article to pick my starting QB.
    • I mean, we’ve only gotten two transfers that went on to play college football, one who went to UT Martin came his second semester junior year before the new coaching staff was here, and the other one went on to play at Maryville College, in which I don’t believe he had any interest prior to transferring.
×
  • Create New...