Jump to content

Central vs AC


MAVERICK1995
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If Central was good enough to beat Powell, I think they're good enough to beat AC. But I don't think Central can stop AC's running game. I say AC 35-24!!

I mentioned above stop Stinson, you stop Central.

Central had 37 pts against Powell. Stinson scored 4 tds, most all of them long runs, or a kickoff return. If they shut him down AC wins no problem, if not it could be a long night for AC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mentioned above stop Stinson, you stop Central.

Central had 37 pts against Powell. Stinson scored 4 tds, most all of them long runs, or a kickoff return. If they shut him down AC wins no problem, if not it could be a long night for AC.

I thought Central would be the most improved team in our district from last year to this year. So far, it looks like CC gets the nod on that title. Haha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC is comming off a tough loss.. I look for a mad and focused group of Mavericks to come out Friday night.. We will be underdogs...

Are you just looking for someone to say something stupid so you can insult them. Who in their right mind would call AC an underdog in this game? I do think that the game may be close. but AC has to be the favorite. As for the statement that if you stop Stinson you stop Central, that is true. I would argue that that is true of most of the teams in this district. Stop Owenby and you stop Powell. Stop the big receiver at CC you stop them. Stop the RB at AC you stop them. That is not new. Before I get the argument that there are other players on those teams that can score, I know the Hicks kid is special, the Garden kid a Powell is good. The QB at CC can find other receivers. Central has The Howard kid that can play. I would say that the point is that those guys are hard to stop and if you can you got a good shot at winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you just looking for someone to say something stupid so you can insult them. Who in their right mind would call AC an underdog in this game? I do think that the game may be close. but AC has to be the favorite. As for the statement that if you stop Stinson you stop Central, that is true. I would argue that that is true of most of the teams in this district. Stop Owenby and you stop Powell. Stop the big receiver at CC you stop them. Stop the RB at AC you stop them. That is not new. Before I get the argument that there are other players on those teams that can score, I know the Hicks kid is special, the Garden kid a Powell is good. The QB at CC can find other receivers. Central has The Howard kid that can play. I would say that the point is that those guys are hard to stop and if you can you got a good shot at winning.

I would agree. I would say though, some of those players play a more important role to their teams than others. Like you said, the CC qb can always find a new receiver, but stopping Stinson or Owenby takes away the majority of the team's offense. I've seen it first hand with Central, as I'm sure you have as well. Not saying the others from Central can't score, just saying the score will be much lower if you control Stinson. Minus Stinson's tds, Powell would've won the game 35-9. I'm sure it'd be reversed without Owenby. Point is I agree, but for this game stopping Stinson is key for AC, just as stopping Hicks or Fox is for Central. Edited by powellphoto
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • I grew up watching Greene Devil Football since I could walk and still close with a lot of the coaches so should know my history pretty well lol.  Everything worked out the way it should have but firmly believe McCurry would have won some State Title if he wouldn't been let go (Greeneville still runs the same D he brought here and he let Ballard run the O and stayed out of it when it came to calling plays.  Greeneville was put out in the Semi's McCurry's last year against Maryville and the next year Greeneville stayed in 4a and was State Runner up playing were they were placed for the first time by the TSSAA.). It was definitely a McCurry and Ballard show that turned everything around along with the Community buying in and revamping the weight room and field house. Since Ballard got promoted to HC every Coach after him has been within the Greeneville Coaching staff because your right, they know what it takes to win a state championship.  Ballard was a master mine on O and what i think Greeneville has lacked since he left and let some Championships or making it to the Championship slip away over the last few years
    • Sounds like you know your area history well. Going back and looking the records were better than I thought but mostly still beating Upper East TN schools. Ballard sounds like he came/was promoted at the right time.    I do think it’s no coincidence that them keeping the HCs as guys who were former guys on the staff. Too many times schools want a “state championship” leveled coach from the outside but they don’t know the landscape. Promoting from within will help with less turnover and keep the program consistent. 
    • You’re a fool if you think I have more than one account 
    • Looking back they had better records than I recalled against upper East TN.  But they still took off once ballard got there. And beating other good programs 
×
  • Create New...