Region 1 always a passionate fun group lets get is started!

[tmarshall7]

Not a lot of discussion on Jeff County--they might slip in under the radar and become the team to beat in Region 1.  Their wrestlers look solid already early in the season.

[newcoach215]

I'd like to brag on my boys a little bit...

They put in a lot of hard work throughout the preseason. Here is a highlight video displaying some of it:

 

 

 

Got a great group of kids this year! Hoping to start the season out with a bang next weekend and look forward to the Region One competition starting the following Tuesday in Jefferson!

I'm excited to see a bigger and stronger version of last years team. You guys have a deep line up this season. Its going to be even tougher to get through you guys than last season. I almost feel like I underestimated you guys this summer but didnt put into account that you only graduated 2 or 3 last season.

[newcoach215]

106

1-Nelson(TN),9
2-English(JC),9
3-Miller(DB),10
4-Kromoff(DC),9

113

1-Bynum(DC),11
2-Fuller(TN),10
3-Bear(VOL),12
4-Austin(SH),10

120

1-Bishop(DB),10
2-Lane(SH),11
3-Buck(TN),10
4-Nicholes(ME),9

126

1-Hurley(TN),10
2-Hudgens(SH),12
3-Waugh(DB),10
4-Hux(JC),9

132

1-Porter(ME),11
2-Pendley,(TN),9
3-Harer(DB),12
4-Edwards(JC),12

138

1-Vaughn(SH),12
2-Williams(ME),11
3-Spoon(MW),12
4-Randles(JC),11

145

1-Bagley(SH),12
2-Jeffers(DB),10
3-Vest(DC),11
4-Grothe(MW),10

152

1-Frye(DB),12
2-Broyles(MW),11
3-Rolston(SH),11
4-Armstrong(VOL),11

160

1-Dean(DB),11
2-Jessee(SH),11
3-Kennedy(TN),11
4-Stelter(DC),12

170

1-Begely(DB),11
2-Kalogeros(SH),10
3-English(JC),11
4-Patrick(VOL),10

182

1-Jones(TN),12
2-Hardin(SH),11
3-Laughlin(DB),11
4-Thompson(ME),10

195 I need a little help 195-220

1-Hunter Bagley(SH),10
2-?
3-?
4-?

 

Thoughts?

[MidTennFan80]

106

 

1-Nelson(TN),9

2-English(JC),9

3-Miller(DB),10

4-Kromoff(DC),9

 

113

 

1-Bynum(DC),11

2-Fuller(TN),10

3-Bear(VOL),12

4-Austin(SH),10

 

120

 

1-Bishop(DB),10

2-Lane(SH),11

3-Buck(TN),10

4-Nicholes(ME),9

 

126

 

1-Hurley(TN),10

2-Hudgens(SH),12

3-Waugh(DB),10

4-Hux(JC),9

 

132

 

1-Porter(ME),11

2-Pendley,(TN),9

3-Harer(DB),12

4-Edwards(JC),12

 

138

 

1-Vaughn(SH),12

2-Williams(ME),11

3-Spoon(MW),12

4-Randles(JC),11

 

145

 

1-Bagley(SH),12

2-Jeffers(DB),10

3-Vest(DC),11

4-Grothe(MW),10

 

152

 

1-Frye(DB),12

2-Broyles(MW),11

3-Rolston(SH),11

4-Armstrong(VOL),11

 

160

 

1-Dean(DB),11

2-Jessee(SH),11

3-Kennedy(TN),11

4-Stelter(DC),12

 

170

 

1-Begely(DB),11

2-Kalogeros(SH),10

3-English(JC),11

4-Patrick(VOL),10

 

182

 

1-Jones(TN),12

2-Hardin(SH),11

3-Laughlin(DB),11

4-Thompson(ME),10

 

195 I need a little help 195-220

 

1-Hunter Bagley(SH),10

2-?

3-?

4-?

 

Thoughts?

Don't know Kennedy(TH) 160 or Jones(TH) 182. Spangler(TH) is the only one I see missing from the list. Also don't know much about 195-220 other than Morelock(SH) I think he wrestled 285 last year.

[newcoach215]

Don't know Kennedy(TH) 160 or Jones(TH) 182. Spangler(TH) is the only one I see missing from the list. Also don't know much about 195-220 other than Morelock(SH) I think he wrestled 285 last year.

shoot I ment Spangler but was thinking of jack jones for some reason. My mistake.

[tmarshall7]

106

 

1-Nelson(TN),9

2-English(JC),9

3-Miller(DB),10

4-Kromoff(DC),9

 

113

 

1-Bynum(DC),11

2-Fuller(TN),10

3-Bear(VOL),12

4-Austin(SH),10

 

120

 

1-Bishop(DB),10

2-Lane(SH),11

3-Buck(TN),10

4-Nicholes(ME),9

 

126

 

1-Hurley(TN),10

2-Hudgens(SH),12

3-Waugh(DB),10

4-Hux(JC),9

 

132

 

1-Porter(ME),11

2-Pendley,(TN),9

3-Harer(DB),12

4-Edwards(JC),12

 

138

 

1-Vaughn(SH),12

2-Williams(ME),11

3-Spoon(MW),12

4-Randles(JC),11

 

145

 

1-Bagley(SH),12

2-Jeffers(DB),10

3-Vest(DC),11

4-Grothe(MW),10

 

152

 

1-Frye(DB),12

2-Broyles(MW),11

3-Rolston(SH),11

4-Armstrong(VOL),11

 

160

 

1-Dean(DB),11

2-Jessee(SH),11

3-Kennedy(TN),11

4-Stelter(DC),12

 

170

 

1-Begely(DB),11

2-Kalogeros(SH),10

3-English(JC),11

4-Patrick(VOL),10

 

182

 

1-Jones(TN),12

2-Hardin(SH),11

3-Laughlin(DB),11

4-Thompson(ME),10

 

195 I need a little help 195-220

 

1-Hunter Bagley(SH),10

2-?

3-?

4-?

 

Thoughts?

 

I think this is a good starting point for debate NewCoach. 

 

Buck,120 is not wrestling this year and I don't think Lane will be back at 120.  Kennedy,160 graduated.  Curious to see if Bynum makes it back to 113. 

 

Is this the same Landon Porter at 32 that was at 52 last year? 

[newcoach215]

I think this is a good starting point for debate NewCoach.

 

Buck,120 is not wrestling this year and I don't think Lane will be back at 120. Kennedy,160 graduated. Curious to see if Bynum makes it back to 113.

 

Is this the same Landon Porter at 32 that was at 52 last year?

feel free to make any kind of corrections! Just something I threw together. Yes that is him I believe at least thats what it says on nwcaonline

[newcoach215]

This will burn some people up but using a system I came up with this morning I came up with the pound for pound top 10 best wrestlers in the region. Heres what I got. Feel free to express opinions!

 

 

1-Max Vaughn(Science Hill)
2-Austin Frye(Dobyns Bennett)
3-Austin Bagley(Science Hill)
4-Palmer Begely(Dobyns Bennett)
5-Corbin Hurley(Tennessee High)
6-Griffyn Broyles(Morristown West)
7-Josh Spangler(Tennessee High)
8-Gary Hudgins(Science Hill)
9-Storm Williams(Morristown East)
10-Landon Porter(Morristown East)
 

[BringBack119]

How many state medals come from these ten guys?

 

How do you feel this top ten compares to all the other top ten from the other regions?

 

Just curious

[tmarshall7]

How many state medals come from these ten guys?

 

How do you feel this top ten compares to all the other top ten from the other regions?

 

Just curious

 

Not seeing how this comment was necessary. 

[BringBack119]

I said I was just curious so don't get your panties in a wad

[tmarshall7]

Too late.  I'm pretty sure you know the answer to your question which was exactly your point in asking it.  Your smarta$$ veiled "curiosity" was not necessary.