Jump to content
Reporting Scores to CoachT ×
How to edit games

8AA 2014 Predictions

BaxterBiRite1996

By BaxterBiRite1996
in Boys Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

rabbitranch Contender

rabbitranch

Posted
Posted

 Colton Blevins of York Institute is By Far and Away the Best Player in that District and also the Best Player in Middle Tennessee...2nd Best PLayer in that region is the Guard for Celina...Both of those are Legit Prospect that can get to the rim,turn the corner,get space off the bounce,create their own shot and both defend pretty well...All those characteristics are a must at the D1 level...Players that rely on other players to get them open/spot up shooters, are a liability at the collegiate level,especially D1....But Eldridge is a Beast in that district and a heck of a High School Player...Best of Luck to ALL the Hoopers throughout the State

Blevins-York and Key-Clay co. are very good and should have a great future, but  Middle Tn. encompasses a large area with a lot of players. Apparently you have seen ALL the players on ALL the teams in Middle Tn. play. If not, your display of arrogance leaves a lot to be desired. P.S.- I would wager that you haven't seen half the players from 8AA on the court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 753
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MCTIGERS12
MCTIGERS12

This is how i think the standings will be going into the district tournament   1.Livingston Academy   2.Macon County   3.Cannon County   4.Dekalb County   5.York Institute   6.Upperman  

dctiger
dctiger

The fact that we are still coming away from these with wins is a positive to me.

dctiger
dctiger

Our D isn't bad at all if we stay committed. Tonight's case was more of them hitting just about everything they threw up after the half. Including that 3/4 court bomb at the end of the third. Honestly

oldkodger Contender

oldkodger

Posted
Posted

Blevins-York and Key-Clay co. are very good and should have a great future, but  Middle Tn. encompasses a large area with a lot of players. Apparently you have seen ALL the players on ALL the teams in Middle Tn. play. If not, your display of arrogance leaves a lot to be desired. P.S.- I would wager that you haven't seen half the players from 8AA on the court.

Yeah that guy sounds like he really knows the mid state very well. Forget the fact that Braxton Blackwell is one of the top players in the nation, he isn't even in the top 2 in middle tenn lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCTIGERFAN Record Holder

DCTIGERFAN

Posted
Posted

What does everyone make of the teams strength of schedule? It was updated today at 10:44 A.M.

 

YI: 7th

MC: 18th

LA: 30th

DC: 34th

U: 39th

SC: 46th

MCM: 54th

CC: 57th

 

I find it funny a few people, and one specific CC fan in general has been ragging on DC's scheduling of F.C Boyd, yet CC has the weakest schedule in the district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jar2h Trainer

Jar2h

Posted
Posted

What does everyone make of the teams strength of schedule? It was updated today at 10:44 A.M.

 

YI: 7th

MC: 18th

LA: 30th

DC: 34th

U: 39th

SC: 46th

MCM: 54th

CC: 57th

 

I find it funny a few people, and one specific CC fan in general has been ragging on DC's scheduling of F.C Boyd, yet CC has the weakest schedule in the district.

oh please. If you play Boyd four times, that's pathetic. Do we really have to keep going through this? Cannon played the runner-up in state and should have beat them. They have beaten Livingston at their place. They are first in the district. So let me tell you what the rankings mean-jack squat.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
spreadthewealth Advanced Member

spreadthewealth

Posted
Posted (edited)

What does everyone make of the teams strength of schedule? It was updated today at 10:44 A.M.

 

YI: 7th

MC: 18th

LA: 30th

DC: 34th

U: 39th

SC: 46th

MCM: 54th

CC: 57th

 

I find it funny a few people, and one specific CC fan in general has been ragging on DC's scheduling of F.C Boyd, yet CC has the weakest schedule in the district.

Go look at CC's schedule. Opened with Chattanooga Brainerd, East Nashville, Hamilton Heights, Marshall Co KY, Columbia...best rethink your reliability on those rankings.

 

I guess everyone has to find something to talk about when your team isn't winning though. Plus, CC's strength rating is #9 so when you have to play Dekalb twice with a strength rating of #30 of course your strength of schedule rating will be pulled down. It is common mathematics.

Edited by spreadthewealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCTIGERFAN Record Holder

DCTIGERFAN

Posted
Posted

Go look at CC's schedule. Opened with Chattanooga Brainerd, East Nashville, Hamilton Heights, Marshall Co KY, Columbia...best rethink your reliability on those rankings.

 

I guess everyone has to find something to talk about when your team isn't winning though.

Those aren't my rankings, and didn't say I agreed with them. I also don't agree on DC scheduling Boyd as much as they did. I'm just trying to figure out/understand how the so called "experts" came to the conclusion of those rankings,

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wbryguy Competitor

wbryguy

Posted
Posted

What does everyone make of the teams strength of schedule? It was updated today at 10:44 A.M.

 

YI: 7th

MC: 18th

LA: 30th

DC: 34th

U: 39th

SC: 46th

MCM: 54th

CC: 57th

 

 

 

 

I find it funny a few people, and one specific CC fan in general has been ragging on DC's scheduling of F.C Boyd, yet CC has the weakest schedule in the district.

You lost all credibility with this poster. Boyd Chr like Hamilton Heights I'm guessing does not register in coacht schedule ratings....apparently I need to tell you which team between the two is better because your post proves so. This is laughable...DC person trying to throw stones at CC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
spreadthewealth Advanced Member

spreadthewealth

Posted
Posted (edited)

Those aren't my rankings, and didn't say I agreed with them. I also don't agree on DC scheduling Boyd as much as they did. I'm just trying to figure out/understand how the so called "experts" came to the conclusion of those rankings,

Once again it is common mathematics...CC's with a strength rating of #9 plays Dekalb twice at #30, York twice at #45, Macon twice at #32, etc. So yes, CC's strength of schedule will suffer some.

 

You might find those ratings funny, but I find it funny that this is the only thing you can contribute to this thread at this point in time. We all just expected more from you.

Edited by spreadthewealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites
spreadthewealth Advanced Member

spreadthewealth

Posted
Posted

My gosh, talk about sensitive. Who really cares? He noted something that is accessible to all on CoachT. People can interpret as they wish. It makes no difference.

Not sensitive. Just stating facts. I agree it makes no difference. I'm sure if he would have called LA out like that we would all have to hear about your legacy and D1 players again. Right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCTIGERFAN Record Holder

DCTIGERFAN

Posted
Posted

Lol I accomplished what I had hoped. My post has really stirred the pot and upset the Cannon County fans. Yes, DC's schedule is very weak. Yes, we aren't a very good team this year. Yalls moderate success the last 2-3 years have really gone to your head. All 8aa teams outside of maybe LA has up and down years. There is a difference between DC's bad seasons (a 10 win season, a 12 win season) compared to CC bad. I remember CC having a 8 win season, followed by a winless season, followed by a 4 win season, followed by a 9 win season, followed by a 11 win season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DCTIGERFAN Record Holder

DCTIGERFAN

Posted
Posted

Once again it is common mathematics...CC's with a strength rating of #9 plays Dekalb twice at #30, York twice at #45, Macon twice at #32, etc. So yes, CC's strength of schedule will suffer some.

 

You might find those ratings funny, but I find it funny that this is the only thing you can contribute to this thread at this point in time. We all just expected more from you.

Dude, you have been on this site since 2009 and have a total of 5 posts. What is it you think you contribute to this site? I don't closely follow basketball, so no, I don't really have much to contribute as far as basketball goes. I was just getting a rise out of the Cannon Co fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • ipb7
      Clinton grade changing scandal

      By ipb7 · Posted

      One final thought. Coach Keith claims he was not aware of the player's failing grades. I won't comment on that, just to say this, IF he did not, whose job was it to see that this kid did not play ball at CHS? That person should be looking for a job and they might be, I don't know.
    • ipb7
      Clinton grade changing scandal

      By ipb7 · Posted

      They have fired the principal, 2 teachers, at least 1 counsellor and 1 coach so far. I don't see it from my view in Oak Ridge as a coach thing, he  was just implicated in asking 1 teacher to  fix 1 kid's grades.   In our local media(Clinton and Oak Ridge)the principal is who is the originator and pusher of the fraud. The others are peripheral. The coach isn't even the big story, just here on a sports site.  The media view is the principal did it to cause CHS to be seen as excellent by the state. He committed fraud to do that so he might spend a little time in jail IF that is valid.
    • MoEastBeast
      Clinton grade changing scandal

      By MoEastBeast · Posted

      And from coach himself, he wasn’t told he was let go because of the ineligible player.    that’s just what the schools needed to happen to fit their bull 
    • MoEastBeast
      Clinton grade changing scandal

      By MoEastBeast · Posted

      Wish it was made clear before a coach gets let go or not retained instead of being sold as the reason he was in trouble. I was told the kids who got grades changed, 97% or better were non athletes but the coach is taking all the heat so the schools can pretend it wasn’t their job to know. heck, what do you think could happen when you hire husband and wife as head principal and head guidance….   that’s not being said though…
    • JIMBOH
      Thanks to the people that voted for Clemer for the head coaching job at Greenback.

      By JIMBOH · Posted

      Hmmmmm……doe dee doe doe.  Last time I came up there to watch my pirates one of those guys in that pickup trucks flattened the tires on the lawnmower.  This is payback.  You can bet the lawnmower on that.
×
×
  • Create New...