Jump to content

Cannon county football


Jar2h
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow did not know that, that option is better than not being allowed to have a program at all, does basketball have that same option

That's true. If the football program actually had half as much support as the basketball program they could at least be competitive. That's all you could expect in a place like woodbury. Im just a huge football fan and would love to see the place I call home be good at the sport I and many other cannon residents love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about the whole support team but when our high school team played there last year they were 1-8 at the time and they had a very good crowd form what I can remember, so it looks like the support is there.  The basketball issue is what it is but if they win and put good products on the floor they should not be punished for that.  Jealousy is a bad thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Termite

Yes but it's just a collection of players from different grammar schools. There is not really a feeder middle school program to the high school. That's why I suggest an actual middle school be built!

Isn't the basketball teams a collection of kids from different grammar schools?  Smith Co has Defeated Creek, Union Heights, Forks River, New Middleton, SC middle school, and Gordonsville middle school. Each have a jr high basketball team. Kids from those feeder schools can go to SC middle school, or Gordonsville to play football. They go to Forks River and Gordonsville for baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah all the grammar schools have a school basketball team but no football teams. That's the big difference!

Only SC middle & Gville junior high have football teams. Kids from other schools can play football at either....really no difference.

Edited by Antwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only SC middle & Gville junior high have football teams. Kids from other schools can play football at either....really no difference.

Except there are two schools with actual football teams. Cannon has six grammar schools with no football teams. It is just a collection of players playing for what I would assume is a volunteer coach. I don't know that for a fact but would guess that's true. heck the head coach of the high school team is barely out of high school himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except there are two schools with actual football teams. Cannon has six grammar schools with no football teams. It is just a collection of players playing for what I would assume is a volunteer coach. I don't know that for a fact but would guess that's true. heck the head coach of the high school team is barely out of high school himself.

Cannon has 6 schools for 1 team. SC has 6 schools for 2 teams. I would guarantee the coaches get little or no compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...