Jump to content

AC Mavs @ Carter


Mavericksinflight
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Mavericksinflight said:

Carter started out 0-3 and have manged to get going and are 3-3. Carter has the area leading QB and Carter just upset Karns. The ball should be flying all over the place on Friday night. The Mavs survived another scare last Friday night. This should be a fast paced game and look for some interceptions on both sides.

I think there should be an asterisk on their record after the Karns finish, fwiw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, osunut2 said:

I think there should be an asterisk on their record after the Karns finish, fwiw.

Only asterisk that needs to be passed out on this one…is the last play should have never been allowed to happen, but we love ending the game with an INT. I do, however, find it a smidge ironic that a representative from Powell would be on here passing out asterisks, FWIW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wow, the Carter troll brigade decided to show up...

I'm not sure if anyone addressed this in the Karns-Carter thread, so I'll post this comment there as well - What is the NFHS rule in that situation? I've not been able to find this particular scenario clearly spelled out in the TSSAA or NFHS rulebook. If a fair catch had been called, no time is required to come off of the clock, but that obviously wasn't the case here. Not the same rulebook, but NCAA rules do not require the clock to start if the ball is cleanly recovered by a receiving player that is down (like what we saw on Friday night). Ohio high schools (OHSAA) have a similar rule.

I'm just wondering what the rule is in TN because I haven't been able to find it. I was under the impression that the rule here is the same as Ohio (and college, in this instance). Apparently the officials on the field Friday night were under the same impression, as far as I can tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mavericksinflight said:

Now I have to watch the Carter and Karns game. Got my interest going. ;)

Pull up the Diamond Clear Media archive, and just watch the final couple of minutes. Incredible finish.

Not sure if you know MIF, but I'd love for someone who knows the NFHS/TSSAA rulebook to speak to the timing issue on the final kickoff.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, osunut2 said:

Oh wow, the Carter troll brigade decided to show up...

I'm not sure if anyone addressed this in the Karns-Carter thread, so I'll post this comment there as well - What is the NFHS rule in that situation? I've not been able to find this particular scenario clearly spelled out in the TSSAA or NFHS rulebook. If a fair catch had been called, no time is required to come off of the clock, but that obviously wasn't the case here. Not the same rulebook, but NCAA rules do not require the clock to start if the ball is cleanly recovered by a receiving player that is down (like what we saw on Friday night). Ohio high schools (OHSAA) have a similar rule.

I'm just wondering what the rule is in TN because I haven't been able to find it. I was under the impression that the rule here is the same as Ohio (and college, in this instance). Apparently the officials on the field Friday night were under the same impression, as far as I can tell.

1. The last play was not a TD. It was intercepted at the 1 yard line and ruled and INT…. Before that ball was even thrown.. two flags were thrown at the LOS (one for QB being across the LOS and one for off holding). 
 

furthermore, after the TD .7 seconds were left on the clock and the ball was squibbed at a Karns front line player. If the ball is fielded in the field of play on a bouncing ball (not fair caught)  The clock is supposed to run at least 1 second off. (The actual rule is .8 seconds). So the final Hail Mary was never supposed to happen. 
 

Not building a rocket here my guy. 

Edited by GatorTDMaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GatorTDMaker said:

1. The last play was not a TD. It was intercepted at the 1 yard line and ruled and INT…. Before that ball was even thrown.. two flags were thrown at the LOS (one for QB being across the LOS and one for off holding). 
 

furthermore, after the TD .7 seconds were left on the clock and the ball was squibbed at a Karns front line player. If the ball is fielded in the field of play on a bouncing ball (not fair caught)  The clock is supposed to run at least 1 second off. (The actual rule is .8 seconds). So the final Hail Mary was never supposed to happen. 
 

Not building a rocket here my guy. 

That's pretty clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GatorTDMaker said:

1. The last play was not a TD. It was intercepted at the 1 yard line and ruled and INT…. Before that ball was even thrown.. two flags were thrown at the LOS (one for QB being across the LOS and one for off holding). 
 

furthermore, after the TD .7 seconds were left on the clock and the ball was squibbed at a Karns front line player. If the ball is fielded in the field of play on a bouncing ball (not fair caught)  The clock is supposed to run at least 1 second off. (The actual rule is .8 seconds). So the final Hail Mary was never supposed to happen. 
 

Not building a rocket here my guy. 

Can you point me to that kickoff rule? Not saying your wrong, I'd just like to know for my own edification because I've not been able to find it.

Also, I've gone back and watched that hail mary a few times. I can't speak to the illegal forward pass because the camera had already focused on the end zone before the ball was thrown. That feed also doesn't confirm that the officials ever indicated that there was a penalty of any kind on that play. Only those who were at the game (I assume you were) can speak to where it was thrown from.

Pretty clear from the replay that Bishop and the DB both appear to catch the ball. The DB's backside lands at the one, while Bishop rolls over the DB and ends up lying in the end zone. I assume that there was an official on top of the play, but it was never clear in the video what the call was on the field. Again, another situation where I can only speak to what I saw on video.

I'm just trying to better understand what actually happened, and you'll have to pardon my skepticism. I was just hoping to hear from someone who didn't have any skin in that game.

Edited by osunut2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, osunut2 said:

Oh wow, the Carter troll brigade decided to show up...

I'm not sure if anyone addressed this in the Karns-Carter thread, so I'll post this comment there as well - What is the NFHS rule in that situation? I've not been able to find this particular scenario clearly spelled out in the TSSAA or NFHS rulebook. If a fair catch had been called, no time is required to come off of the clock, but that obviously wasn't the case here. Not the same rulebook, but NCAA rules do not require the clock to start if the ball is cleanly recovered by a receiving player that is down (like what we saw on Friday night). Ohio high schools (OHSAA) have a similar rule.

I'm just wondering what the rule is in TN because I haven't been able to find it. I was under the impression that the rule here is the same as Ohio (and college, in this instance). Apparently the officials on the field Friday night were under the same impression, as far as I can tell.

They lost so us and they tried to say stuff like this its how Powell is. We will be ready for Carter with another tough week of practice. Guys are feeling the vibe in the school. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Why? Low pay. Low budget thanks to the Rotary milking the programs revenue. Foul smell. There are other negative things... Positives: the players and being toward the top of the classification numbers wise.
    • What we have here is an influx of outsiders raining down on the town of Maryville like a swarm of locust trying to change our culture into the same crap they moved away from. I have no issues with anyone coming here but don't bring your politics with you. Most people around here never pay attention to the elections and keep letting the same ole rats and vermin right back in the back door and wonder why things are like they are. The problem at Maryville High is mainly due to letting outsiders get a foothold on control and shove their agenda down everyone's throat. Anyone that leaves there or let's say ranoff are replaced with an outsider with the same mindset. Eventually Maryville High will never be the same as it once was which I'm beginning to believe already but it's only chance of survival are to recruit people that will get in there and reverse the damage that has already happened.
    • Didn’t Dyersburg and Covington beat Westview pretty good last year
    • Barn wood ewe considur this bein' a knew Mairvul Mintality orr a chainge inn cullchure....???  
    • Athletics is just a piece. It can help them academically, socially and add confidence. I was still 17 when I finished my first quarter at UT. I was the last to get my driver's license. It's not always just for athletics. 
×
  • Create New...