rollredroll Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 I listened to the Coach's radio show tonight and Coach Rutledge confirmed what BigRed3 already told us regarding the PI call (and it actually is PI). Coach said he would be surprised if this call were made against MBA again this year. I don't know if the radio guys ever look on here, but tonight was their best show yet, hands down. Great job. Hope the MBA guys are enjoying the off-week - they certainly need it to heal up - but also hope they've got their minds on MUS. No other team in DII-AAA has given MBA fits as much as the Owls have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRed3 Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 sadly...i was that receiver that convered santi up... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 Sally, get it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addictedtosports.com Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 Quite possibly the game of the year. This is what high school sports is all about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtm3 Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 ROLL RED Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addictedtosports.com Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 was this game recorded and how do we get a copy of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBAalumnus Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 WR TE T G C G T TE QB WR rb Did it look like this? key being that WR should have been off LOS? I guess that makes sense as only the furthest guy out on the LOS is eligible right? But I still say the call should be "illegal touch." Seems like "pass interference" is disrupting a defender's right to the ball... heck, I'm not arguing with the coach though... beat MUS.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
addictedtosports.com Posted October 15, 2003 Report Share Posted October 15, 2003 WR TE T G C G T TE QB WR rb Did it look like this? key being that WR should have been off LOS? I guess that makes sense as only the furthest guy out on the LOS is eligible right? But I still say the call should be "illegal touch." Seems like "pass interference" is disrupting a defender's right to the ball... heck, I'm not arguing with the coach though... beat MUS.... Correct, the TE on the left is not eligible. What was the situation and the call for those of us that were not at the game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.