Jump to content

Recruiting vs. Financial Aid


FairInMyFavor
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not looking to get into a public/private debate, but I copied the line below from "The Tennessean" sports message board.

 

"supply me with one example of a boy on the montgomery bell academy (#9 in the nation according to usa today) football team who has been "recruited" by anyone to play. "

 

I wonder if the operative word is "recruited." If no players for MBA or BA have been "recruited," are there any from either school who are receiving "financial aid" for any reason? Offering financial aid, even though it may be "need based," is a form of recruitment.

 

My .02 worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic belongs in the Private-Public forum.

 

Have you ever considered the fact that probably 75% of the students who receive financial aid at MBA don't even play football?

So you're saying that fully 25% of all financial aid students are on the football team at MBA? That sounds high. How many students receive financial aid at MBA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most common definition I see of the word “recruit”, outside of those pertaining to military service, is “to register formally, as a participant or member”. MBA does register students as members of the student body. It would be safe to say that MBA actively markets its school, whether it be through “Admissions Open House” signs in the front lawn or its active presence on radio (football games, coach’s show, advertisements for night classes available to the community, etc.). That being said, MBA’s applicant pool primarily comes from word of mouth, tradition, and legacy (the same can be said for some other private schools). The students who are accepted from that applicant pool are subject to an admissions exam and a rigorous academic and extracurricular curriculum upon matriculation. The school's college acceptance rate, AP exam test scores, SAT scores, and National Merit students bears this out.

 

MBA does provide financial aid. Anyone can access the school’s IRS filings online for free (as well as the filings for BA, McCallie, MUS, et al.). The latest available filing shows that financial aid accounted for approximately 6% of total tuition dollars at MBA. Tuition covers only about 60-70% of the total cost to educate a student. The difference comes from generous donations made to the school, primarily by alumni and parents.

 

The vast majority of students on athletic teams at MBA - football or otherwise - are full-paying students, and with a couple of exceptions, these full-paying students are the ones who make the largest contributions to MBA's athletic programs. This may be tough to swallow for the non-believers out there, but it’s true. And, unlike many of the allegations made on the public/private thread, it can largely be proven with hard data, government filings, and school-issued annual reports.

 

Private schools do have an advantage by providing need-based financial aid - it allows them to have a more diverse student body. However, from what I have seen personally at MBA - this year and other years - I don't see how it tilts the scales so heavily in the Big Red's favor on the athletic fields.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughter attends a 1A private school. Students who receive financial aid are not allowed to participate in High School sports. Maybe this is a rule at the school level only. I thought it was a TSSAA rule, however, I am not well versed in these matters. Just another thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughter attends a 1A private school. Students who receive financial aid are not allowed to participate in High School sports. Maybe this is a rule at the school level only. I thought it was a TSSAA rule, however, I am not well versed in these matters. Just another thought.

Nick,

Div II schools such as MBA, BA etc are allowed to offer financial aid. Div I Private schools are not allowed to offer financial aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic belongs in the Private-Public forum.

 

Have you ever considered the fact that probably 75% of the students who receive financial aid at MBA don't even play football?

So you're saying that fully 25% of all financial aid students are on the football team at MBA? That sounds high. How many students receive financial aid at MBA?

You are correct - 75% is probably too low. My point is at MBA - or BA - a very high percentage of the football team or basketball, baseball, golf, tennis, etc. teams receive no financial aid. I don't have a dog in this fight but it is my strong opinion that MBA and BA "recruit" students first and some of those happen to be athletes.

Edited by Bighurt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick,

Div II schools such as MBA, BA etc are allowed to offer financial aid. Div I Private schools are not allowed to offer financial aid.

Or said another way, DI private schools that give financial aid CHOOSE to be in the division that prohibits them from allowing any child who receives financial aid to play a varsity sport. Don't forget, it is not the TSSAA that is disallowing financial aid recipients from playing---it is the board or the head of that particular school.

I do not understand that mentality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major issue redup is the fact that it is a 3rd party who decide on the suitability of Financial Aid in Div II. Most of the Div I privates are church associated and want to make their own choices on aid for the kids they know about and not be governed by some organization hundreds of miles away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the major issue redup is the fact that it is a 3rd party who decide on the suitability of Financial Aid in Div II. Most of the Div I privates are church associated and want to make their own choices on aid for the kids they know about and not be governed by some organization hundreds of miles away.

 

Don't understand your point.

 

I don't think the "3rd party" deciding financial aid has anything to do with DI Fn Aid schools being in DI. According to what you seem to imply, DI schools want the freedon to give any amount they deem necessary to any student they want to give to and not be governed by Princeton. Any DII school can do just that, but NOT to an athlete. And of course the same applies to DI.

 

Any DII school, (a majority of which are church related), can give aid in any amount to a non-athlete---it is only the athletes that must be reported to TSSAA and who must be receiving only what SSS, the "3rd party" shows as need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Playing high school sports is a privilege not a right.  The college did not have to rescind the scholarship.  Scholarship offers are pulled all the time for a number of reasons. That was 100% their choice.  A coach can keep, cut, or dismiss any player that they want to without reason anytime they want.  Is that the right way to run a program?? I don't think that it is, but these are the facts of the matter. This case has absolutely 0% chance of going in the plaintiff's favor. Futhermore, I'd imagine that these administrators and the coach are a part of some teaching or coaching organization that will cover at least 1 million dollars each in legal fees. Obviously the kid and her family feel like there were "damages" thus the lawsuit.  Unfortunately, the law is not on their side in this case.  
    • Maryville will recapture the loses from last year against West, Bradley and Farragut. The Bearden game will be the tough one but I look for the wheels to come off that ride somewhere down the road because of all the crap that goes on there. I know to many parents there and some of the things I've been told and some of the post a few of them have made on facebook. They all can't be liars.
    • If Heritage moves down and Alcoa moves up the best thing for Heritage is to do what William Blount did when theystopped playing Maryville or meet certain defeat. Honestly can't see Alcoa not moving up the way the county is growing. Might be in the Mountaineers best interest to stay in 5A because none of those teams on their schedule are anything close to Alcoa.
    • I say over as well. Barney, regarding the move to 4A, will the cross-town blowhards move up as well??
×
  • Create New...