thegreatwhite1

No reasonable lawyer would take up this case. I am not a lawyer, but I know school law in and out. Similar situations just like this play out thousands of times each year across the country, even at the college level (i.e. Ole Miss) The Plaintiff's never win...ever. If I am wrong, please provide a legal precedent for me. I will be waiting. https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/39431892/judge-drops-ole-miss-player-lawsuit-lane-kiffin

Playing high school sports is a privilege not a right. The college did not have to rescind the scholarship. Scholarship offers are pulled all the time for a number of reasons. That was 100% their choice. A coach can keep, cut, or dismiss any player that they want to without reason anytime they want. Is that the right way to run a program?? I don't think that it is, but these are the facts of the matter. This case has absolutely 0% chance of going in the plaintiff's favor. Futhermore, I'd imagine that these administrators and the coach are a part of some teaching or coaching organization that will cover at least 1 million dollars each in legal fees. Obviously the kid and her family feel like there were "damages" thus the lawsuit. Unfortunately, the law is not on their side in this case.

I am not aware of any legal precedents in which the plaintiff in this case would win. If so, what are they? This player's family is going to spend the cost of college tuition x4 in legal fees if it ever even makes it to court IMO.

Heyworth at FC will be the exact same disaster that it was at Grundy. Take that to the bank.

Fair enough. Can't beat them if you don't play them.

They should be playing McMinn County tonight

I like the Georgia model better than the Tennessee dead period. GA rolls the dead period out the first week of June (the first week after school ends for most) and the 1st week of July.

Coaches knew all season when the region tournaments began so it’s completely up to them when to hold their district tournaments being that the TSSAA has nothing to do with those. Gripe at your coach or district coaches, not the TSSAA. This is a much better format than the previous format. I’m a little partial to the old Final Four format where you had to win Monday, Wednesday, and Friday to make the Spring Fling. Seeing teams “celebrate” being the Region Runner up is a microcosm of the participation trophy generation that is here to stay IMO.

If Central can beat Bradley, they’ll beat GC. That’s the best AA win in the state this season. Winning the first one was the biggest hurdle for the Baby Blue. They’ve got a Championship pedigree and a seasoned coach to lead em all the way to the gold ball. Go Blue!

It is not difficult to implement. Georgia adopted it this season and it was a non-issue.

Anyone who supports free market capitalism should fully embrace Name Image and Likeness. NIL is free market capitalism at its finest. Paying for apartments, paying bills, providing vehicles, and providing employment for parents has been going on for years and years across the state across many sports. The TSSAA just took this issue off of their plate. These issues have been and will continue to be nearly impossible to police.

McMinn has the arm depth with four D-1 signees/commits on the bump. I’d really like their chances in this format if they weren't in the same bracket with Farragut. My money is on the Admirals

It’s 100% on the coaches to convey to their teams what the consequences are for fighting/leaving the benches. The precedent has been set by the TSSAA, and we all know it includes a post season ban. If making the post season is important, this must be instilled into the players. No excuses

They’ve beaten two schools so far whose combined enrollment is slightly more than half of Warren’s. Get fat on the cupcakes while you can.

I Wish the Cats all the best