Jump to content

Pickett County vs. Livingston Academy


yuckamuck
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pickett Co. will win this one by double digits. I've saw both play and would say this one won't be close.

Pickett Co. could win, but to say that it wont be close...You must not know to much about basketball...

 

It will be a close game that can go either way..

I look for the big man Matt Reeder to make the difference and LA comes out with a win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a much larger school and being one of the best in 7AA, they should be heavy favorites any time these two schools play considering Pickett Co. is one of the smallest schools in the state. LA will be up for this game I think to avenge their 100-61 loss the last time these two teams met. Shouldn't a good AA team be expected to beat a small A team?

 

I have watched both play and this will be a good ball game, and yes we all know that Pickett County is smaller than LA, however those of us that live in this area also know that Pickett County holds their kids back alot of the times so when your playing against a Senior from Pickett County he is most definately old enough to vote and some have said almost and i did say almost legal drinking age!!! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does age have to do with a large school having a lot more players to pick from? Just because someone is a few months older, in a few cases, doesn't give then any more talent. There are a lot of senior teams around which have no talent and plenty of young teams which do. The large schools have a lot more students and should usually be better, but in this case, they usually don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Livingston has about 500-600 more kids than Pickett.

Livingston has a good team but they came out flat....probably had something to do with the delay of the game and the dedication of the gym. But do not take anything away from PC they get after you on defense! They are well coached and can run an offense this year and not just run up and down the floor. I look for both teams to finish in the top two of their district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A ten minute delay shouldn't make a team go flat. Pickett's "old men" are just more talented and they start four JUNIORS, so so much for holding back players making a difference. They went up 15-0 and had a 32 point lead at one time. Livingston did a great job on holding Bailey to just 16 points, but he also was playing on a bad ankle. Josh Wright and Lance Mason played outstanding games each scoring 18 points, Luke Mason was great as always on D, and Dustin Mitchell played very well off the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...