Matman rankings

[Hamm]

Now posted at:

 

http://www.tennwrestling.com/05matmantn_6.htm

[Hamm]

Hey guys...I haven't gotten much feedback this time...what gives? What do you guys think?

[aolisbad]

Why do you rank Weakley of Clarksville at 189 when he wrestles at 215. Last night he beat Brooks od Dickson 3-2

[usfjim]

good job.

 

glad to see another mustang, who was trying to fly under the radar, in the mix. look for him to make an impact this weekend at ryan.

[aolisbad]

Clarksville is headed east to Greenville

[glovebox27]

No offense, Spencer Sommers is not 4th in state. Masters from Riverdale beat him, and he is having a tough enough time getting to state. matt Brink should be in there somwhere if Spencer is.

Edited January 4, 2005 by glovebox27

[Hamm]

No offense taken glove...but to answer your question of course Sommers has lost to Riverdale (a non qualifier), but he has also beaten a few guys that are ranked. Not to mention he is a Region Runner up (to Bond Davis). Keep in mind, when I rank guys, i'm not predicting where these guys will place in state or that they will place at all. I have my own little point system that I use and the rankings are simply the top 6 point leaders.

 

aolisbad...Weakly, from what I understand, is a 189lber that bumps up in dual matches to wrestle 215. If you noticed that he did beat Brooks recently at 215, but he also placed 3rd at McCallie at 189. There is a similar situation going on at Blackman with Kenny Meredith.

Edited January 4, 2005 by Hamm

[sweattolose]

Pease pinned Heacock at Kenwood. He should be in at 152.

[coachush]

Why has Ryan Fuller been ranked 2nd at both 125 and 135 the past two rankings?

Is he bumping up and down or is it a mistake?

[mtnrasslin]

Why has Ryan Fuller been ranked 2nd at both 125 and 135 the past two rankings?

Is he bumping up and down or is it a mistake?

825506378[/snapback]

I believe that '25 is Mikey Fuller- Ryan's little brother.

Edited January 4, 2005 by mtnrasslin

[Seth Van Horn]

I have my own little point system that I use and the rankings are simply the top 6 point leaders.

 

What exactly do you take into consideration??

[BuckLateral]

Hey guys...I haven't gotten much feedback this time...what gives?  What do you guys think?

825506300[/snapback]

 

 

Ask and you shall receive, Hamm.

 

You have Josh Jennings, Overton, No.1 at 130. However, he has wrestled 135 in all the dual results I have seen for Overton, including most recently at the New York tournament over the Christmas break. He also wrestled at 135 in the individual portion of the tournament, finishing second , losing in overtime in the championship match. Unlike Wheakley, he does not appear to be a 130 wrestling up at 135 for dual meets . So, why do you have him at 130, instead of 135 ? Just curios as to what your thinking is in placing him there, not whether he should be No.1 or not?