Jump to content

Don't let the TSSAA get away with this one


WriteStuff
 Share

Recommended Posts

Last thing and I'm done...call me what you will.  But it won't pass.  Most member schools are against it and because of that, it won't pass.  Board of control is supposed to represent the member schools.  Also, if they change basketball they'll have to change softball, baseball, volleyball, and soccer..you think they are going to do that.  SO, continue to run me and the TSSAA down.  Call me a sycophant and tell me to black the boots.  According to you my opinion can only be because I have some connection over their...like bernard childress is my father or something thumb  :P

825509164[/snapback]

 

 

Muffin- Carter and Menees are not a part of the Board of Control.  They will have no vote on the matter on January 13.  Looking in the mirror and seeing someone that knows more than you.  Salty...if you will look further I have also posted in favor of public schools and understand that there is an advantage for private schools and was glad to see soemthing done, but I think it went a little far and you want to talk about not being represented, how many private admins are on either board...only one on there was elected as a public admin...but that is another forum...so "black those boots........"  is a characterization and not an insult.  Ok.  Ignorant is not a name, it is a state of mind, uninformed...i guess a characterization of people who speak out of frustration rather than knowledge.  January 13 the BOC will vote it down because a great majority of member schools don't want it and because too many other sports would have to be changed.  Spring fling would cease to exist, it would be a complete dud instead of just a bad idea.  So I lied, I wasn't done....I guess I support privates but I couldn't support private christian schools.

825509270[/snapback]

Hickory: I thought you were finished????

Edited by Lions Den
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

But Hickory, I will agree with you on this: That it won't pass because not many schools, coachs,players or fans are for it. I believe that is fact statewide!! And the Board of Control is suppose to repersent their regions.

 

So what if it does pass- then is it safe to say it's what ever (Carter, Menees and Childress) want.

 

 

Show me the money- t$$aa. They really should adopt this motto!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The state office will not enforce rules and only schedules playoffs and tournaments.

If you host an invitational hoops tourney you have to pay 17% of gross gate to TSSAA. Do they charge for all sports. Wrestling doesnt pay in most places. Softball doesn't in the west. Is it only basketball tourneys that must be sanctioned. If you play in an unsanction event is there penalties. No, not if Carter and crew have to do work. I want a job just attending sporting events.

Coach K

Edited by trojanbob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time the T$$AA tried to mess with the basketball play off system was about five years ago. They went to a super-sectional system, three teams from each region played. Well, the #3 team from Regiom 4 came out #2 in that super-sectional tournament. The rest is history. Jackson Co was that #3 regional team that went on to win 4 Championships in a row.

By the way the T$$AA went back to the old system the following year.

An improvement idea that went sour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TSSAA made over $ 621,000 from Basketball tournaments in fy 2004.

 

They paid out $ 249,999 in attorney fees.

 

The executive director is paid more than $ 110,000.

 

Food for thought.

 

Public Info on any non-profit (TSSAA) organization is available at guidestar.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone who is backing the T$$AA in this means well but I have to disagree.....When the regions and districts were realigned in Nov. , with very few exceptions, there was strong disagreement from the west with the proposed plan, especially in football and basketball.....but the plan continued and was approved. It seems to me that certain BOARD OF CONTROL and TSSAA representatives special interests were well served by that plan so hence the approval...So why should we think that complaining to our representatives would change anything when it comes to this, the latest hair-brained plan in an ever increasing long list of hair-brained plans??....it is all about the money and very little about the well-being of our kids....certain people and schools are being catered to (or at least there is definitely a pattern of favoritism :huh: ) and it is this that causes the suspicion and skepticism every time an even slightly controversial issue comes up. If we don't look out for the best interest of our children then who will??...the TSSAA? :P I think we already know the answer to that question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements


  • Recent Posts

    • Fortuitously encountering Clint amidst the ambience of Goodyear this morning sparked an impromptu yet intellectually stimulating conversation, wherein we engaged in a rigorous assessment of prospective candidates for the esteemed role of head football coach. Our discourse, characterized by its spontaneity and depth, led to the formulation of astute observations and discerning judgments regarding the suitability of various individuals for this pivotal position. Allow me to elucidate the fruits of our collaborative contemplation: This commentary endeavors to offer a discerning articulation of my subjective viewpoint, emphasizing a conscientious commitment to maintaining impartiality and refraining from any semblance of derogation directed towards individuals.  Those who possess meritorious qualifications for the esteemed head coaching role, delineated without hierarchical precedence, include: Rennard Woodmore, an esteemed alumnus of the Yellow Jackets, presents a magnificent pedigree, having held prominent positions in head coaching capacities across various regions. His pivotal role as a coordinator for teams contending for state championships further enhances his stature in the realm of football leadership. Kyle Gregory, erstwhile adorned in the resplendent gold insignia, though lacking direct head coaching experience, brings to the fore his invaluable insights garnered as a coordinator for esteemed teams, showcasing an acute understanding of the requisites for triumph whilst attired in the esteemed purple and gold regalia. Steven Jackson, whose contributions transcended mere clipboard duties under the tutelage of Kevin Creasy, emerges as an exceptional candidate for Trousdale County. His prior tenure and triumphs as an assistant coach underscore his suitability for the role. The sole drawback lies in his lack of affiliation with Trousdale County as an alumnus. Brandon Eden's extensive tenure within the chronicles of Trousdale County football, spanning a significant portion of its State Championships, coupled with his successful stints as a coordinator across diverse locales, underscores his candidacy despite a dearth of direct head coaching experience at the high school level. Davy Cothron, while beset by a modest playing career, has emerged as a luminary in offensive strategy, drawing parallels to the transformative appointment of Barker in 2015, thereby warranting consideration for his proven acumen in this realm. Joshua Hackett, notwithstanding his non-alumnus status, has left an indelible imprint across Middle Tennessee, distinguished by his adept curation of formidable defensive units as a coordinator at Watertown, albeit without direct head coaching experience. Kevin Creasy, the epitome of coaching prowess, merits an offer irrespective of his current inclinations, his unparalleled capacity to secure victories transcending geographical and institutional bounds, potentially extending to a role as Director of Schools should it align with his aspirations. Conversely, individuals who have not demonstrably earned the mantle of head coaching, enumerated without sequential precedence, encompass: Brad Waggoner David Barker Paul Pitts Jeremy Pruitt Clint Satterfield Robbie Atwood Wesley Satterfield Ben Johnson BJ West Whom do you all deem most fitting to assume the mantle of the next coach, and what rationale informs your choice? Conversely, whom do you perceive as ill-suited for the role, and what underpins your reasoning for their exclusion?
    • He's a Clinton fan.  But I wouldn't admit that either.  
    • Their any schedule out their for team camp?
    • This sums it all up to perfection.  
    • Just read the article! In one statement he says he didn’t know the player was academically ineligible yet he also says he met with a teacher in 2022 to discuss putting the player in credit recovery.  I find it hard to believe a Head Coach doesn’t know a player is not eligible; are they not responsible for clearing them to the TSSAA?   
×
  • Create New...