Jump to content

LazIndex 6A Rankings & Predictions Semifinals


LazIndexTN
 Share

Recommended Posts

6A

1 (1) OAKLAND (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  2.035 ; Power: 147.36 ; Sched. Rank: 31 (20)

 

3 (2) MARYVILLE ; Rating:  2.006 ; Power: 141.11 ; Sched. Rank: 17 (10)

 

5 (3) WHITEHAVEN (Memphis) ; Rating:  1.857 ; Power: 134.10 ; Sched. Rank: 50 (25)

 

18 (4) CORDOVA ; Rating:  1.680 ; Power: 125.36 ; Sched. Rank: 98 (30)

 

20 (5) BRADLEY CENTRAL (Cleveland) ; Rating:  1.677 ; Power: 128.67 ; Sched. Rank: 13 (6)

 

21 (6) FRANKLIN ; Rating:  1.673 ; Power: 127.92 ; Sched. Rank: 30 (19)

 

22 (7) BLACKMAN (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  1.641 ; Power: 125.93 ; Sched. Rank: 19 (11)

 

28 (8) HARDIN VALLEY (Knoxville) ; Rating:  1.589 ; Power: 122.08 ; Sched. Rank: 22 (13)

 

31 (9) MT. JULIET ; Rating:  1.577 ; Power: 125.22 ; Sched. Rank: 55 (28)

 

38 (10) SCIENCE HILL (Johnson City) ; Rating:  1.549 ; Power: 122.71 ; Sched. Rank: 9 (2)

 

40 (11) WILSON CENTRAL (Lebanon) ; Rating:  1.507 ; Power: 122.63 ; Sched. Rank: 54 (27)

 

48 (12) SMYRNA ; Rating:  1.471 ; Power: 126.95 ; Sched. Rank: 24 (14)

 

51 (13) NASHVILLE JOHN OVERTON ; Rating:  1.457 ; Power: 121.77 ; Sched. Rank: 32 (21)

 

53 (14) RIVERDALE (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  1.455 ; Power: 124.18 ; Sched. Rank: 11 (4)

 

55 (15) WHITE STATION (Memphis) ; Rating:  1.445 ; Power: 121.83 ; Sched. Rank: 41 (24)

 

62 (16) DOBYNS BENNETT (Kingsport) ; Rating:  1.424 ; Power: 120.83 ; Sched. Rank: 15 (8)

 

67 (17) RAVENWOOD (Brentwood) ; Rating:  1.407 ; Power: 117.36 ; Sched. Rank: 29 (18)

 

92 (18) COOKEVILLE ; Rating:  1.314 ; Power: 115.27 ; Sched. Rank: 60 (29)

 

100 (19) COLLIERVILLE ; Rating:  1.279 ; Power: 114.65 ; Sched. Rank: 52 (26)

 

108 (20) BEARDEN (Knoxville) ; Rating:  1.253 ; Power: 113.43 ; Sched. Rank: 21 (12)

 

123 (21) SIEGEL (Murfreesboro) ; Rating:  1.199 ; Power: 113.96 ; Sched. Rank: 12 (5)

 

126 (22) ARLINGTON ; Rating:  1.170 ; Power: 109.98 ; Sched. Rank: 100 (31)

 

129 (23) JEFFERSON COUNTY (Dandridge) ; Rating:  1.150 ; Power: 107.41 ; Sched. Rank: 10 (3)

 

130 (24) HOUSTON (Germantown) ; Rating:  1.139 ; Power: 104.50 ; Sched. Rank: 25 (15)

 

137 (25) WILLIAM BLOUNT (Maryville) ; Rating:  1.121 ; Power: 107.92 ; Sched. Rank: 8 (1)

 

148 (26) GERMANTOWN ; Rating:  1.091 ; Power: 106.42 ; Sched. Rank: 28 (17)

 

166 (27) ANTIOCH ; Rating:  1.043 ; Power: 100.96 ; Sched. Rank: 33 (22)

 

179 (28) WARREN COUNTY (McMinnville) ; Rating:  0.999 ; Power: 101.64 ; Sched. Rank: 26 (16)

 

195 (29) COFFEE COUNTY (Manchester) ; Rating:  0.961 ; Power: 101.39 ; Sched. Rank: 14 (7)

 

200 (30) McGAVOCK (Nashville) ; Rating:  0.946 ; Power: 99.73 ; Sched. Rank: 16 (9)

 

210 (31) BARTLETT ; Rating:  0.912 ; Power: 95.17 ; Sched. Rank: 106 (32)

 

231 (32) LEBANON ; Rating:  0.846 ; Power: 93.14 ; Sched. Rank: 38 (23)

 

 

Predictions

OAKLAND (Murfreesboro) over MARYVILLE by 6.2

 

WHITEHAVEN (Memphis) over CORDOVA by 8.7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp thairs anuuthur one pickin' Okelund.....Scirry.... :unsure:

 

 I think he got a premature period too , i'm sure his point spread is 62pts , which is pretty close to your pick which I'm sure involves Scientific Data and Similar Cifering Equations as your Master Level Math . Nawt from the Nawt Stuff . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

Announcements

  • Recent Posts

    • Yes this process is moving slower than I would have expected
    • also was told coady auston applied, he served as defensive coordinator for greenfield under don pitt several years ago before going to Obion county  
    • TSSAA restrictions for hiring non-faculty coaches have been removed for over a year at this point. In the past a non-faculty person had to be "grandfathered" by being an assistant coach for five years, being fingerprinted, and having a background check run per TSSAA rules... since those were rescinded, the board of directors for the school district are responsible for any/all restrictions on hiring non-faculty personnel. I guess what I'm saying to you is that if you really wanted what you posted, it's already possible as long as your local BOE will allow for it.
    • stop it, rlh. you’re gonna get me all misty eyed and sentimental.    i see seven fairly regularly. ….but slim shady, that’s like spotting bigfoot on main street. you just hope he doesn’t spot you. 
    • Are you trying to say you didn't find Seven and ShadySlim going at it?
×
  • Create New...